Real Estate Prices ---

Google Answers: Real Estate Prices --- Leading Indicators Log in | Google Answers Home View Question Ask a Question Q: Real Estate Prices --- Leading Indicators ( Answered , 5 Comments ) Question Subject: Real Estate Prices --- Leading Indicators Category: Family and Home > Home Asked by: nronronronro-ga List Price: $25.00 Posted: 19 Apr 2005 15:33 PDT Expires: 19 May 2005 15:33 PDT Question ID: 511542 Hi There!I was goofing off today, and started looking throughwww.craigslist.com for real estate. I looked at 11 different citiesfrom San Francisco to Phoenix to Washington, D.C.Mini-Eureka moment! I noticed the number of lease-options availablehas increased significantly in each and every city. 11 of 11 towns! The last time I checked www.craigslist.com was 5 months ago.This observation sparked my rusty brain cells. There must be leadingindicators for real estate, in the same way there are leadingindicators for stocks. Here's a list of possible danger signals forreal estate off the "top of my head":1. Increasing lease-options2. Increasing number of days on the market3. Increasing number of unsold homes in a city4. Decreasing ratio of Asking Price/Transaction Price5. Increasing number of homes on the market more than 120 days6. Decreasing number of mortgage applications7. Increasing number of newspaper classified ads for real estateI'm not a real estate guy. But I'm sure some brilliant professor hasdevised a computer model to predict when real estate prices willdecline 6-12 months hence.A 5-star answer would be 5-10 additional leading indicators for realestate. No background material needed. (However, if you happen tofind an objective study on leading indicators then I would love totake a look at that, too.)All comments greatly appreciated!Thanks.ronP.S. Please note that indicators like "Forecasted Job Growth" or"Forecasted Property Tax Receipts" won't help much, precisely becausethey are forecasts and not hard data. The best indicators wouldinvolve hard numbers that can be observed right now, and used to makecomparisons.EXAMPLES:1. Days on the market for San Francisco versus days on the market for Phoenix.2. Days on the market for San Francisco in April 2005 versus days onthe market in San Francisco in January 2002.(This question doesn't involve specific numbers or specific cities. Rather, it involves the kind of indicators one might observe. Thx.) Answer Subject: Re: Real Estate Prices --- Leading Indicators Answered By: easterangel-ga on 19 Apr 2005 16:59 PDT Rated: Hi! Thanks for the question.The National Association of Realtors provides a list of real estateindicators that one can analyze to indicate some trends. Here are someof the indicators that they follow:- Existing Home Sales- Pending Home Sales Index- New Home Sales- Housing Starts- Housing Affordability- Mortgage Rates- Mortgage Applications“Latest Economic Indicators” http://www.realtor.org/Research.nsf/Pages/EcoIndicator The US Census website provides a historical basis for its leadingindicators for real estate. The statistics are from 1900 to 2002.The indicators mentioned in the Census website are the following:- New housing units started - New one family houses sold- Existing one family houses sold- Manufacturing shipments- Index of industrial production- Manufacturing index- Retail Sales- Exports Basis- General Imports“No. HS-40. Economic Indicators for Construction, Real Estate, Manufacturing,Retail, and Foreign Trade Sectors: 1900 to 2002” http://www.census.gov/statab/hist/HS-40.pdf Finally, here is an academic study about real estate prices.“Real Estate Prices and Economic Cycles” http://urbanpolicy.berkeley.edu/pdf/Q_IRER99PB.pdf Search terms used: “real estate” housing economic indicatorsstudies real estate prices filetype:pdfI hope these links would help you in your research. Before rating thisanswer, please ask for a clarification if you have a question or ifyou would need further information. Thanks for visiting us. Regards, Easterangel-ga Google Answers Researcher Request for Answer Clarification by nronronronro-ga on 20 May 2005 15:33 PDT Alas, Phil...only the women in my life are cash-flow positive. Thatis to say, they stay positive when I let the cash flow.heh heh hehThanks for your great insights, Phil. As always!ron Clarification of Answer by easterangel-ga on 20 May 2005 17:43 PDT Hi!Sorry about this but I just have to make a reply to clarifications.Sincerely.Easterangel nronronronro-ga rated this answer: Heavenly answer, easterangel.As always, thanks a million !ron Comments Log in to add a comment Subject: Re: Real Estate Prices --- Leading Indicators From: easterangel-ga on 19 Apr 2005 18:25 PDT You're welcome as well. Subject: Re: Real Estate Prices --- Leading Indicators From: pafalafa-ga on 20 Apr 2005 05:03 PDT Since we're doing some work on the house in DC, I've been paying moreattention that usual to the real estate pages of the Washington Post.One of the sort-of-indicators that they mention often is theincreasing amount of property that is bought as an investment, ratherthan as a first home. They also cite the increasing trends in2nd-home sales.For both of these though, I don't know if there's an actual statistic,or just the observation of people in the business.Nice work, though, easterangel.paf Subject: Re: Real Estate Prices --- Leading Indicators From: nronronronro-ga on 20 Apr 2005 10:52 PDT Thanks, pafalafa!My business partner just purchased a home across the street from theNational Cathedral. He obviously checked out DC. He found the "PMIRisk Index" for DC was very low, whereas the same PMI Risk Index formy state (California) was very high. The only place more risky thanSan Francisco/San Jose was Boston.Rut Row !ron Subject: Re: Real Estate Prices --- Leading Indicators From: silver777-ga on 24 Apr 2005 05:35 PDT Ron,Your application of logic is spot on.Your points 1 to 7 could relate to any real estate market.In fact, I had counted the number of "for sale" ads by COLUMNnot just the pages. I also counted the number of propertiesfor lease. Another gauge might be to weigh the newspaper, orin the least the real estate section. I reckon that the more "for lease" properties tells us a lot about the climate of the sale market. An increase in borrowing rates will impact on the rental rates and realised sale prices,regardless of the asking prices published. Check also the auctionclearance rates.Have you sourced any cash-flow positive properties of late?Phil Subject: Re: Real Estate Prices --- Leading Indicators From: nronronronro-ga on 20 May 2005 15:34 PDT Alas, Phil...only the women in my life are cash-flow positive. Thatis to say, they stay positive when I let the cash flow.heh heh hehThanks for your great insights, Phil. As always!ron Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service . If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-editors@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. Search Google Answers for all questions answered questions unanswered questions Google Home - Answers Help & Tips - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy ©2005 Google

Buy House

Free Home - Housing Grants-Free Money For A Better Home-Buy House Free Home Grants - Free Home Matthew Lesko Home Grants | Grant Writing | Pay Bills | Cart 4,000 Little-Known Government Money Programs That Give Out Free Grants, Direct Payments, And Other Free Money so People can Buy Their Dream Home or Become a Real Estate Investor . Anyone can qualify People Of All Ages And All Incomes. Even people with bad credit and millionaires. FIND OUT HOW YOU CAN GET: $200,000 Buy Or Fix Up A Home In The Country $5 Million Home Grants - Build An Apartment Building 50% Discount For Teachers To Buy A Home $27 Thousand Home Grants To Fix Up Your Home $500 Per Month To Pay Your Rent $7 Million Grants - For Investors, Builders and Developers Build Houses and Apartments $150 Thousand To Purchase A Condominium $27,500 In Home Grants and Loans To Fix Up Your Home $48K Grants - Buy A Mobile Home $277 Thousand Grants - To Help Purchase a 2-4 Family Dwelling $100Thousand Home Grants To Buy Or Fix Up Houses In Older Areas Of A Town $15K Down Payment and Closing Costs $30K Home Grants - Teachers To Fix Up Their House $5K Make an Apartment Out Of Your Basement $2K Security Deposit for Renters $800 Help Pay Property Tax 0% Low Interest Loans To Buy A House $2,000,000 Home Grants - To Build Apartment Buildings $35,000 To Paint Your Home $25K Home Grants - Repair Your Septic Tank $3K Cover Your Mortgage Payments MoneyFor People With Bad Credit $75K Home Grants - Put An Office In Your Home $10K Emergency Home Repairs $20K Home Grants - Fix Up Your Home Fre e Help With Roofing, Plumbing, & Electrical Work $4K Grants - PaintYour Home $7K Seniors To Fix Up Their Home $35K Forgivable Loan To Buy A House Money Single Parents To Buy A Home Pay $60K For A $100,000 Home Grants - New Home $2,000 Home Grants - Fix Up Your Home Save $2.000 On Your Heating Bills 50% Discount On Your Energy Bills Save $1 a House and Get $8 More FREE $1,200 Seniors Foreolosure Giveaways Get A Home No Matter What Your Income $2K Pay Your Mortgage Payments $7K Home Grants - Make Your Home Handicap Accessible Don't Borrow When there is FREE MONEY to Help You Own The House Of Your Dreams!!! You have a right to take advantage of every legitimate free home program that is available from the thousands of government agencies that will help you realize your dream. It's your tax dollars that support these programs. You're paying for them, so you should use them There are grants for every income category and every situation. Most of them are for middle class taxpayers just like you. There are even free grants where the government considers you disadvantaged if you have $750,000 in the bank. 90-DAY NO RISK, MONEY BACK GUARANTEE If you are not completely satisfied with your purchase, you have 90-days to return it for a complete refund excluding postage. NO QUESTIONS ASKED. This is a personal guarantee from Matthew Lesko. New York Times Best S elling Author, Matthew Lesko He has 25 years of experience educating everyone from Fortune 500 companies to average taxpayers about free government home grants programs. Two of his books have been on the New York Times Best Seller Lists. Two have received awards from the American Library Association. He has written over 100 books on the subject. He has written syndicated columns for The New York Times and Good Housekeeping Magazine and has been a regular on hundreds of TV talk shows including Larry King, The Today Show, Jay Leno's Tonight Show, Letterman and Oprah. PROPERTY ORDER NOW AND GET THIS FREE REPORT HOW TO BUY FORECLOSED PROPERTY Everything you need to know about Buying Foreclosed Home and Property. Loaded with Information on Auctions, Home Grants, Timing, I.O.U.s, Leins, Taxes, Government Properties, Zoning, Permits and much more. Order FREE MONEY FOR A BETTER HOME and HOW TO BUY FORECLOSED PROPERTY now for just $39.95+$6.95 postage and handling BUT WAIT: LESKO'S FREE GRANTS FOR A BETTER HOME PREMIUM PACKAGE OFFERS A BIGGER VALUE Lesko's Free Money For A Better Home Premium Package gives you all of the products above plus Lesko's personalized 3-hour video training course . Lesko takes you step-by-step through the process of how to use the government to get the grants and help you need. Lesko has spent the last 25 years of his life helping Fortune 500 companies as well as thousands of consumers get free money from the government. So don't just get Lesko's books, get his books plus the necessary training to insure that you get all your tax dollars you are paying for. In 3-hours Lesko gives you a PhD in government money. But it's not like school because Lesko is knowledgeable, informative and loads of fun. So you have nothing to lose except your BILLS. Free Money For A Better Home 770-page book Plus: How To Buy Foreclosed Property Plus: Lesko's 3-Hour DVD Training Course $64.95 + $6.95 postage and handling OR Free Money For A Better Home 770-page book Plus: How To Buy Foreclosed Property Plus: Lesko's 3-Hour VHS Video Training Course $59.95 + $6.95 postage and handling Matthew Lesko Free Money Government Grants - State Grants - Pell Grants - US Grants - Business Grants - Free Grants - Education Grants College Grants - Grants for Women - Goverment Grants - Housing Grants - Quit Your Job - Business & Money - US Government Grants - Grant Money Small Business Grants - Federal Grants - Student Grants - Free Money to Pay Bills - Free Government Grants - Grants for College - Free Government Money Technology Grants - Art Grants - Scholarships and Grants - Grants for Teachers - Law Enforcement Grants - Personal Grants - Minority Business Grants Foundation Grants - Home Grants - Writing Grants - Shopping Cart - Press Statements - Matthew lesko free - Testimonials - Resources - Site Map 2005 Matthew Lesko free money, government grants

Texas Land Buyers Log

Recreation Motivates Texas Land Buyers Recreational Land Purchases - Wildlife - Ag News & Views Recreation Motivates Texas Land Buyers Log In | Register My Profile | Log Out Ag Home Page Agricultural Staff Consulting Teams   NF-1 Team (coming soon)   NF-2 Team (coming soon)   NF-3 Team   NF-4 Team (coming soon) Ag News & Views Jr. Beef Excellence Program Consultation Program Custom Hire Listings eCattleLog Feed Library Hunting & Recreational Leases Agricultural Tools Online Publications   Ag Info Index   Economics   Forages   Horticulture   Livestock   Soils   Wildlife Plant Image Gallery Internships Wildlife: July, 2003 July, 2003 Table of Contents Other Wildlife Articles by Grant Huggins It's a fact – today's rural land buyers are more likely to have hunting and fishing on their minds than cows or cotton. Recreation is the primary motive fueling the rural Texas land market." This statement by Judon Fambrough, Senior Lecturer in Real Estate Law of the Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University (REC), shouldn't be a surprise to observers of the Texas land market. In fact, there isn't anything close to recreation, particularly hunting and fishing, as a motive for buyers of Texas land. The following chart from Charles E. Gilliland, Research Economist of the REC, shows the buyer motives rated as "very important" in the REC fall 2002 survey of Texas real estate appraisers, brokers, lenders and government officials. The survey question recorded the groups' opinion of all factors that were "very important" in land purchase decisions; most buyers incorporate several factors in their decision, and thus the categories add to more than 100%. Figure 1 shows that those surveyed believe 80% of buyers rate hunting and fishing quality as very important in their land purchase decision, up from 67% in the fall 2001 survey. Gilliland says that according to their surveys, recreation has been the dominant motive of Texas land buyers since spring 1995. These observations may have relevance to south central Oklahoma land values, where many Metroplex buyers are seeking less expensive retreats than the going prices in Texas. These trends should be taken into consideration when making land management decisions. Game animals are a product of native vegetation. They are not generally abundant in landscapes dominated by introduced vegetation, whether it is forage or crops. Knowledgeable land buyers understand this. The REC produces a report which divides Texas into 33 Land Market Areas (LMA). The most recent data available is their Fall 2001 report. Their report on LMA 22, containing Montague, Cooke, Grayson and Fannin counties of the NF Agricultural Division's Texas service area, includes Table 1. Statewide values are listed for comparison. Gilliland points out that "…rangeland generally attracts the recreational buyers prevalent in today's market." Prudent land managers should consider conversion costs, management costs, opportunity costs of alternate enterprises and impacts on future land values before converting native vegetation to other land uses. © 1997-2005 by The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc.

Real Estate Loan Officer

NSCC: Real Estate: Loan Officer Certificate Search/SiteMap | Maps/Directions | Contact Us NSCC Home > Business Programs > Real Estate Program Loan Officer Certificate Real Estate Home Contact Info Faculty Basic Real Estate Basic Sales Advanced Sales Commercial/Invest Appraisal Trainee Certified Residential Appraiser Licensed Residential Appraiser General Appraisal Property Management Brokerage Escrow Loan Officer Loan Processor AAS Degree Appraiser AAS-T Degree Learn about the real estate finance including marketing, buyer, prequalifications, closing costs, and the advantages and disadvantages of various loan programs. Learn the principles of appraising and how to underwrite (approve or reject, based on risk) loan requests. LOAN OFFICER CERTIFICATE Course Credits Quarter 1 RES 100 - Real Estate Fundamentals 5 RES 106 - Real Estate Fraud 1 RES 125 - Applications of Real Estate Math ( 1 ) 2 RES 165 - Real Estate Loan Officer 3 Subtotal: 11 Quarter 2 RES 180 - Basic Appraisal Principles 3 RES 266 - Real Estate Loan Underwriter 3 Choice: Approved Electives ( 2 ) 6 Subtotal: 12 Total 23 Note 1: Students may challenge RES 125 - Applications of Real Estate Math, by passing the RES 125 challenge test and receiving two credits. Note 2: Choose 6 credits from the list below: Approved Real Estate Electives Course Credits RES 101 - Technology for Real Estate 5 RES 110 - Introduction to Commercial Real Estate 3 RES 140 - Real Estate Sales Practice 3 RES 150 - Residential Sales and Leasing Documentation 1.5 RES 166 - Real Estate Loan Processing 4 RES 170 - Real Estate Law 3 RES 175 - Introduction to Title 3 RES 177 - Real Estate Taxes 1.5 RES 190 - Real Estate Escrow I 3 RES 200 - Seminar In Current Real Estate Issues 5 RES 210 - Real Estate Investments 3 RES 220 - Real Estate Economics 3 RES 225 - Current Trends in Real Estate Market Analysis 1.5 RES 260 - Real Estate Finance - Commercial 1.5 RES 298 - Special Projects: Internship in Real Estate 1-6 BUS 140 - Customer Relations 5 BUS 197 - Work Experience: Business - or - CWE 110 - Internship 5 3 BUS 236 - Interpersonal Communication for the Workplace 3-5 Effective Winter 2006 © 2003-2008 North Seattle Community College | Disclaimer | About This Site

buy property to prevent

Neighbors Buying Property To Prevent The Establishment Of A Group Home The Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law Issue: Housing About News In court Take action Publications More resources Topics : Information sheets Advocacy resources on fair housing Jump to an issue: Advance Psych. Directives Children Civil Rights and the ADA Criminalization Education Elders with Mental Illnesses Housing Insurance Involuntary Commitment Managed Care Medicaid Medicare Rx Drug Benefit Mental Healthcare Privacy Restraint and Seclusion Supports in the Community - SSI - Temp. Assist. for Families Voting Fair Housing Information Sheet # 3 Neighbors Buying Property To Prevent The Establishment Of A Group Home Imagine the following scenario: A house in a residential neighborhood is for sale. A provider of residential services to persons with mental retardation believes that the house would be a great location for a group home for three women and submits a bid to purchase the house. Neighbors of the seller learn of the provider's interest in the home and meet to develop strategies for preventing the women from moving into the neighborhood. Eventually, the neighbors conclude that the only way to prevent the provider from purchasing the home is to submit a higher bid. The neighbors realize that none of them can afford to buy the home alone, so they pool their resources, give the money collected to one of the neighbors, and that person offers the seller $5,000 more for the home than does the provider. The seller sells the home to the neighbor acting on behalf of the group. Do the actions of the seller or of the neighbors who purchased the home violate the Fair Housing Act? The FHA makes it unlawful to discriminate in the sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer or renter because of a handicapof (A) that buyer or renter; (B) a person residing in or intending to reside in that dwelling after it is so sold, rented, or made available; or (C) any person associated with that buyer or renter. 42 U.S.C. 3604(f)(1). The FHA contains an exemption for single-family houses sold or rented by an owner, provided that the owner does not use the services of a real estate agent or broker, own more than three such single-family houses, and, if the owner is not a resident, has not completed more than one sale within a 24-month period. 42 U.S.C. 3603(b). Thus, assuming the listed conditions are met, it is likely that the owner cannot be found liable under the 3604(f)(1) of the FHA. But what of the neighbors, who banded together to buy the home in order to prevent persons with disabilities from living there? Courts that have faced this and similar scenarios have answered the question in different ways. In Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service, Inc. v. Babin , 18 F.3d 337, 344 (6 th Cir. 1994), the Sixth Circuit called action similar to that described above as "normal economic competition." The Babin court analyzed the liability of the neighbors who contributed extra funds to make the purchase possible under 3604(f)(1), specifically the "otherwise make unavailable" provision. The court explained that, in normal economic competition, every purchase of a unique commodity affects availability to others. Thus, the court concluded, finding the neighbors liable would cause the statute's reach to be overbroad, and it affirmed the summary judgment entered by the court below. A claim also was asserted against the seller and the neighbors pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 3617, which makes illegal interfering with the exercise and enjoyment of the right to fair housing. The Sixth Circuit also rejected this argument, finding that the seller was motivated purely by economic considerations and that, while the purchase of the house disrupted the provider's negotiations, it did not prevent the provider from making an even higher bid on the property. Babin, then, stands for the proposition that actions related to the purchase of property — even when taken for the sole reason of preventing the use of that property by persons protected under the FHA — is "normal economic competition" and therefore is not a violation of the FHA. Not every court that has considered the issue since the Babin decision has agreed with that proposition, however. In United States v. Hughes , 849 F. Supp. 685 (D. Neb. 1994), the court denied a motion to dismiss and found the Babin decision "plainly wrong" in suggesting that there is an economic competition exception to the FHA. In Hughes , the court determined that a lender, who agreed to finance the purchase of property knowing that the intention of the buyer was to prevent the establishment of a group home, could be liable under 42 U.S.C. 3617. The court held that a bank violates the FHA by intentionally aiding buyers in keeping a home from other purchasers because those other purchasers are or are associated with persons with mental illness: [T]rue ' economic competition' does not exist when the purpose of the competition is to deny a protected person access to housing, as opposed to securing housing for oneself or for investment purposes. In fact, it is irrational to spend money for the purpose of prohibiting someone else from living next to you, if the reason you do not wish to live next to that person is because he or she has a handicap protected by the Act.-- Hughes at 686 (emphasis in original). A third opinion on this issue adopts the Hughes analysis. In Step-by-Step v. Lazarus , No. CV-97-1006 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 1997), the court, in denying a motion to dismiss, held that the FHA "does apply to a buyer who purchases a property with the intention of preventing the purchase by an entity planning to use the property as a Group Home for members protected by the Act." Id. , slip op. at 1. In reaching this conclusion, the court agreed with the Hughes reasoning and stated that normal economic considerations do not exist where the underlying intent of the purchaser is to discriminate. The court found support for this proposition in 24 C.F.R. 103.20(a), which allows the filing of a complaint against "any person" engaged in a discriminatory housing practice, and in 24 C.F.R. 100.50(b)(3), which makes it unlawful to engage in "any conduct" that denies or makes housing unavailable to persons with disabilities. As these cases demonstrate, determining the motives of a buyer, seller, or neighbors and whether such motives are legally relevant is a complex issue. On the one hand, Congress has clearly mandated an end to discrimination in housing, and a narrow interpretation of the FHA, such as in Babin , allows persons with discriminatory intent to prevent individuals with disabilities from moving into a community. On the other hand, examining the private motives to all the various parties to a real estate transaction may be both unwieldy and burdensome. Clearly, it is helpful to fair housing advocates that the reasoning in Babin — even though articulated by an appellate court — was not convincing to the next two courts to consider very similar situations. While it remains too soon to make any definitive pronouncements on the merits of the issues, it is apparent, given the holdings in Hughes and Step-by-Step , that the actions of neighbors who buy property to prevent the establishment of group homes remain subject to viable challenge under the FHA. This information sheet was produced under a contract with the Advocacy Training/Technical Assistance Center of the National Association of Protection & Advocacy Systems For more information, contact Michael Allen, Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, 1101 15th Street, N.W., Suite 1212 Washington, D.C. 20005-5002. Phone: 202/467-5730 ext. 117. E-mail: Michaela@bazelon.org . Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law 1101 15th Street, NW, Suite 1212 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-467-5730 Fax: 202-223-0409 Email: webmaster@bazelon.org Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law 1101 15th Street, NW, Suite 1212 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-467-5730 Fax: 202-223-0409 Email: webmaster@bazelon.org