Buy Home
Adbusters Culturejammer Headquarters Sharon Is Terrorist Number 2 by Avi Shlaim George W. Bush may claim that Ariel Sharon is a “man of peace,” but his track record suggests a different title. Over a 50-year military and political career, Sharon has been responsible for incalculable civilian trauma. from Adbusters #63» Moral Midgets of the Year We say farewell to 2005 with a look at four of the year's most embarrassing newsmakers: stars of less-than-stellar virtue whose shenanigans got them little more than a stern finger-wagging. from Adbusters #63» Putin is Terrorist Number 1: by Boris Berezovsky Humble Economists: by Paul Ormerod more magazine features » more Adbusters.org exclusives » Buy Nothing Day 2005 A big congrats to all those who (did not) participate! Finds out what went on in the name of nothing in our 2005 wrap up. Kick it Over! Students — join your Campus JammerGroup and jam your Econ. department. -- Red Dot Contest September and October winners – come and get your free shoes! Blackspots & Paris Fashion » Shareholder Discounts » Win a Pair of Blackspots » Select One TV Turnoff Unbrand America Antipreneur Drugtaker Blackspot Sneaker Blackspot Music True Cost Eco Media Carta Corp. Crackdown Buy Nothing Day CURRENT TOPICS: Does Media Activism have a future? Is the world becoming more precarious? Is environmentalism dead? more forum topics» Visit the gallery » | what is RSS? The Adbusters newsletter connects you with 84541 other cultural creatives. Watch our punchiest videos » France Norway Japan BAP France Sweden Subscribe | About Us | Contact Us | Submissions | Reprints | Media | Donate
house rent edinburgh .
house rent edinburgh at s1homes house rent edinburgh at s1homes Search house rent edinburgh on Central Scotland's largest independent property website. s1homes allows homeseekers to search across a large range of options for property to rent or buy including house rent edinburgh . Landlords, rental agents, estate agents and solicitors all use s1homes to advertise their properties ensuring that you have the widest choice possible when it comes to finding a home in Glasgow, Edinburgh or anywhere else in Central Scotland. And to make life even easier you can enter your property requirements and email address and we'll send you details of new properties as soon as they come onto the market. We don't even need your name, let alone your address and all that other stuff that some sites want. And, of course, we will never pass your email address on to anybody else. s1homes is part of the s1 family of websites which was set up by the same company that owns The Herald, Evening Times and Sunday Herald newspapers. The site carries more than 3000 properties at any one time attracting tens of thousands of visitors every week. We also regularly advertise on Television. So if you're selling or trying to let a property make sure it appears on s1homes, the largest and most effective property site in Central Scotland. You can post properties yourself using a credit card or your agent can do it all for you. You'd be surprised how little it costs. If you'd like to get in touch, send an email to customerservice@s1homes.com We look forward to hearing from you.
Real Estate Prices Still
Agricultural Economist Newsletter: Winter 2001--Farm Real Estate Prices Still Rising in Minnesota Farm Real Estate Prices Still Rising in Minnesota Steven J. Taff Average Minnesota farm real estate sales prices just keep on climbing (figure 1). This despite low output prices, rising input costs, and continued uncertainty about the future of federal subsidies. Sales price increases were seen in all parts of the state except in the northwest. In this annual sales price summary, I can provide only an overview, some cursory analysis, and--as always--a few opinions. I'll not bore you with text that simply repeats what's already shown in the charts. Instead I'll spend some time discussing how land transaction data are recorded, adjusted, and employed. I think it's useful to go through some administrative and procedural details to further our understanding of what these data are and what they are not. If this prospect makes you say, "Just show me the data, Steve," then you can stop right after the sales summary section. Or, if your impatience knows no bounds, go straight to the Minnesota Land Economics (MLE) Web site at http://apec.umn.edu/faculty/sjtaff/landdata/index.html and start working the numbers yourself. Farm Land Sales in 2000 Assessors are required to report initial assessments in late fall, based on sales data to date. That's why the data are reported on a "record year" basis: these are the sales that were, presumably, available for assessor scrutiny at the time the initial estimated market-values are calculated. Final values are set by summer, to be used in the succeeding tax year. So, for example, sales made in late 1999 are used by assessors to set initial values for January 2001. These estimates are adjusted in spring 2001, finalized in summer 2001, and then used for tax purposes in 2002. The adjusted record year 2000 sales data were therefore not available until April of this year. Figure 2 shows the distribution of all farmland sales in 2000. The bulk of the sales lie between $500 and $2,000 per acre. I excluded a small number of sales that exceeded $5,000 per acre as well as those involving parcels of land less than 20 acres in size. Both were excluded as not being plausibly "agricultural"--despite their designation on the Certificate of Real Estate Value (CRV) as "agricultural" land. (Although excluded from figure 2, these data are included in the MLE Web site data.) Even though MAE readers and MLE Web site users can view the full distribution of sales prices, most still ask for a single number that somehow captures the story behind the figures. Obviously, for a set of sales that span such a wide range in prices, any single number fails completely to accomplish this end. Movements in averages, while arithmetically correct, usually fail to tell the entire story. The particular average I use in this article is a location- and size-weighted mean (table 1). In last year's farm real estate report ( agecon.lib.umn.edu/mn/mae699.pdf ), I discussed the usefulness of such weighting as well as the desirability of examining sales data at the smallest geographic scale possible. Table 1. Minnesota farm real estate sales summary Record year Number of sales Acres sold Average price* 1996 2,504 263,728 936 1997 2,641 296,803 1,039 1998 2,724 303,968 1,113 1999 2,212 235,359 1,196 2000 2,258 250,979 1,222 * Location- and size-weighted per-acre mean Figure 1 compares the movements of actual sales price averages with those two other estimates of land value--the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) annual state estimates (based on a farmer opinion survey) and the average assessor estimates (the location- and size-weighted mean estimated market value). The University of Minnesota sales prices averages are location- and size-weighted means. The fact that all three (somewhat) independent estimates of farmland real estate values shown in figure 1 move in lockstep adds credence, I believe, to the conclusion that, on average, farmland values really are increasing in Minnesota. Geographic variations in real estate values for the past 11 years are shown in the box-and-whisker plots of figure 3. (District boundaries are shown in figure 4.) The range of sales prices for each district for each year is shown by the endpoints of the vertical lines. The ends of each box show the prices at which 25 percent of the sales were higher (or lower). The median is indicated by the horizontal bar within each box. So, for example, the median Central district farmland sale was about $1,200 per acre, with 25 percent of the sales lower than $750 and 75 percent lower than $1,850 per acre. In previous years' reports, I've noted the wide variation in average price movements among districts. Such differences were accentuated in 2000 by the continued climb of values in the South East district combined with the continued stagnation in the North West district (figure 5) . Farm Sale Data When a Minnesota property is sold, the transaction details must be recorded at the county courthouse on a form called a CRV. On it, the seller attests that such-and-such a property was sold to so-and-so on a certain date for a specific price. Other information about the property (its size, soil characteristics, prior year's estimated market value) is often entered on the CRV as well. Frequently, the per-acre prices that underlie this article and are also shown in the MLE Web site are not the prices entered on the CRV. Long before a land sales figure enters the official data base, it has been passed through an array of filters and adjustments designed to make comparison among transactions more meaningful and more reliable. Recording the Transactions There are many possible slips between an ownership change and data analysis. Of course, there is always the chance that simple recording errors are made. For example, numbers may be miscopied from bills of sale onto the CRV, or into a computer file, or into a spreadsheet. There is also a chance of misrepresentation. The person who fills in the CRV might have a reason to understate or overstate the actual sales price--perhaps to avoid a tax. This, of course, is illegal, but, as any courthouse veteran can tell you, it occasionally happens. Not every sale receives further processing. Local or state officials remove from subsequent analysis any sale not deemed "arms-length," because it was sold, for example, to a member of the seller's immediate family. Or, a sale might be pulled because the new buyer intends to convert the land to a non-agricultural use. Adjusting the Prices After this filtering, sales prices are frequently adjusted to make comparison among sales more appropriate. First, to expunge the effects of inflation, sales prices are deflated by an officially reported rate to January 2 of the year in which they were recorded. This "adjustment for time" is fairly minor in years (like the past decade) where inflation has been low. The second adjustment is "for terms." Not all farm real estate sales are for the full property. Some are made through a contract for deed, an arrangement that allows the buyer to pay a certain amount now and other amounts at stated intervals. Until the final payment is made, the property remains in the possession of the seller--even though it has been "sold." Because the full payment schedule is entered on the CRV, the Department of Revenue can calculate a present value of the initial and subsequent payments at an official discount rate. This becomes the official sales price of the property, regardless of what the buyer and seller had in mind when they sealed the deal. Adjustments don't end with a time- and terms-adjusted sales price, honestly reported and accurately recorded. In most cases, users of the data are interested in per-acre prices, not per-parcel prices. That means some chosen total price must be divided by some total acreage. But which price? Which acres? Should we use the total price or should we first subtract out the value of buildings, personal property, ancillary property, or machinery to get closer to the "true" land price? In this article (and on the MLE Web site), I choose to follow conventions established years ago in Minnesota. I report the time- and terms-adjusted total sales price, minus the value of personal property, divided by the entire acreage of the parcel. That's why, when I'm being careful, I speak of the average price of farm real estate, not of farm land . Employing the Data The sales reported here are only those recorded between October 1, 1999, and September 30, 2000. These "record year 2000" sales are so bundled because of the way real estate transactions are used to help local assessors value land for property tax purposes. Strange as it may seem, the Department of Revenue does not collect sales data merely to satisfy the data cravings of University economists like me. No, statewide sales data are collected principally to create statistics that are used to "equalize" property tax valuations across county boundaries. Each year, county assessors are required to assign an estimated market value (EMV) to each of the thousands of real estate parcels in the county. The estimate is supposed to be based on an examination of similar properties that were actually sold recently. (The combined valuations for each township, city, or county are the source of the Land Values--in contrast to the Farmland Sales--data on the MLE Web site.) Because every county has its own assessor who uses largely independent valuation procedures, there are inevitably discontinuities across county lines--even for adjacent properties. Farmer Brown wonders why Farmer Olson's land, just across the fence line in the next county, carries an assessed value that is lower by $200 per acre. The state has created an equalization procedure that is supposed to smooth over such discontinuities. Assuming that nearby properties really would sell for similar prices, any observed difference in assessed values for otherwise similar properties is presumed to be evidence that one or both of the assessors is either undervaluing (that is, assigning an EMV that is too low) or overvaluing properties. To test this, the state calculates a sales ratio (the EMV divided by sales price) for every property sold in a particular area. If an assessor systematically undervalues properties (shown by sales ratios that are consistently lower than some threshold), the state might demand the EMVs in that jurisdiction be uniformly raised, to better accord with what is thought to be "true" market conditions. How Accurate Are the EMVs? We can see for ourselves how close the final assessor estimates are by comparing actual sales prices against the previous year's estimated market values for the same property (figure 2). Each point in the figure represents one sale. For example, the rightmost point is for a property that was estimated to have a value of $4,900 per acre, but actually sold for only $2,900 per acre. While some of the estimates are obviously way off (like this example), the bulk are pretty close. In most cases, the EMV was lower than the sale price, but in a neatly predictable manner. A simple one-variable regression model, shown as the straight line in the figure, accounts for nearly 75 percent of the observed variation in farm real estate sales prices. Parting Thoughts What accounts for the ever-onward-and-upward movement of average farm real estate prices in Minnesota? We need only to round up the usual suspects, most of which I have discussed at length in previous issues of MAE . These include 1) perennial farmer optimism about future crop and livestock prices, 2) expected extensions of federal farm subsidy programs, 3) continued favorable local property tax treatment for farmland, 4) the desire of some farmers to increase the size of their current operation by buying adjacent farmland, 5) the desire of some non-farm buyers to use land as a hedge against inflation, and 6) inflation itself. An additional suspect that we need to add is the increasing prominence of location even in rural land markets. We simply can't explain current price levels on the basis of income potential (including subsidies) and speculation potential alone. Clearly, where the land sits with respect to job centers and what it looks like is influencing the price buyers are willing to pay for a particular parcel of land. As always, I caution potential land buyers and sellers about reading too much into the average land prices reported here and elsewhere. If you've got land to sell or if you have a hankering to buy land--look before you leap. The financial stakes are too high for casual empiricism. Hire an appraiser. Talk with your spouse. Check your finances. Think about the children. Be careful out there! Steven J. Taff is an associate professor and extension economist with the Department of Applied Economics at the University of Minnesota. Return to Minnesota Ag Economist Newsletter Index Page University of Minnesota Extension Service HomePage
Real estate brokers are
Homepage of the California Department of Real Estate (DRE) California Home DRE Home Contact Us What's new About DRE Careers at DRE DRE Records Consumers Escrow Violations eLicensing Examinees Licensees Subdivisions Real Estate Law Regulations Publications Forms FAQs Links Index Department of Real Estate START Examinees and Licensees: Use eLicensing for expedited processing of: Examination services Mailing address changes License renewals Salesperson additions/changes of employing broker Broker certification of salesperson employment Broker discontinuation of salesperson employment Duplicate license requests Additional services Learn to use eLicensing It's easy, paperless and interactive! Resources Key Announcements Brokers Must Report Commission Payments on 1099s Real estate brokers are required to report commission payments of $600 or more to brokers and salespersons on Form 1099-MISC, Box 7 - Nonemployee Compensation. For more information, see 1099 Reporting for Real Estate Brokers published by the Franchise Tax Board. Combination examination and license applications are now available: Broker Examination/License Sales Examination/License Expanded Services: Use eLicensing to apply for the salesperson exam Important Information About: Application Processing Timeframes Satellite Exam Sites for Salespersons and Brokers Can't find what you're looking for? Try the Index Featured Items Topics of Interest: Gulf Coast Hurricanes CalHFA First Time Homeownership Program Instructions to License Applicants Help Avoid DENIAL of Your License Application Guides for First Time Home Buyers and Renters Information for Homebuyers Apply Online for a CalVet Home Loan Predatory Lending Prevention Investigate Before You Invest Small Business and DVBE Opportunities Workers' Compensation Coverage Flex Your Power - Be Energy Efficient! Find out how you can save money, save energy, and save natural resources.   more My CA Customer Survey Course & Instructor Evaluation Back to Top of Page Conditions of Use | Privacy Policy | Tech Problems 2003 State of California This page last modified on Wednesday, December 28, 2005
Investment Property
Investment Property Databank IPD Home About IPD Portfolio Analysis Services Events Indices and Market Information Indices for Derivatives Online Services -- Research Services Indices & Publications Downloads Price List Property Vehicles Databank Lease Events Review In UK Europe France Germany Netherlands Ireland Sweden South Africa Canada Denmark Norway Spain Portugal Price List UK - Publications, Research and other Services Order Form (pdf) Annual Index Free Richard Gwilliam +44 (0)20 7643 9283 Monthly Index Sample 350 Angela Porter +44 (0)20 7643 9291 Quarterly Review 1000 Mark Callender +44 (0)20 7643 9238 Property Investors Digest Sample 3500 Mark Callender +44 (0)20 7643 9238 Key Centres Report Sample 6500 Anglea Sheahan +44 (0)20 7643 9238 Local Market Monitor Sample 250 Anglea Sheahan +44 (0)20 7643 9283 Monthly Market Monitor Sample 2000 Angela Porter +44 (0)20 7643 9291 Market information for Portfolio Managers (MIPS) £3000 Steven Devaney +44 (0)20 7643 9283 Property Funds Review Free to PAS Clients. £495 for non-PAS clients Kevin Swaddle +44 (0)20 7643 9275 Research Studies Quote from: Mark Callender +44 (0)20 7643 9238 Data to Order Quote from: Richard Gwilliam +44 (0)20 7643 9283 UK and European Directories of Property Vehicles UK - £450 European - £650 Both UK & European for £1000 Andreas Arend Mark Callender +44 (0)20 7643 9327 +44 (0)20 7643 9238 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 Europe Order Form (pdf) European Digest Package (excl. UK) £7000 Andreas Arend +44 (0)20 7643 9327 European Digest Package (incl. UK) £9500 Andreas Arend +44 (0)20 7643 9327 UK and European Directories of Property Vehicles UK - £450 European - £650 Both UK & European for £1000 Andreas Arend Mark Callender +44 (0)20 7643 9327 +44 (0)20 7643 9238 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 IPD Multi-Country Spreadsheet Flyer €750 Siobhan Callaghan +44 (0)20 7643 9246 France Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Christian de Kerangal +44 (0)20 7643 9319 +33 (0)1 4501 4102 Property Investors Digest 1100 Carine Dasse +44 (0)20 7643 9319 Key Centres Report 1100 Carine Dasse +44 (0)20 7643 9319 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 Germany Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Nassos Manginas +44 (0)20 7643 9316 Germany Property Digest 3000 Nassos Manginas +44 (0)20 7643 9316 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 The Netherlands Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Ian Townson Aart Hordijk +44 (0)20 7643 9245 +31 70 349 0195 Property Investors Digest 1500 Ian Townson +44 (0)20 7643 9245 Local Market Performance 2000 Ian Townson +44 (0)20 7643 9245 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 Ireland Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Phil Tily +44 (0)20 7643 9311 Property Investors Digest 1500 Phil Tily +44 (0)20 7643 9311 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 Sweden Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Andrew Buckley Joakim Franspm Christina Gustafsson +44 (0)20 7643 9265 +46 (0)850 565231 Property Investors Digest 2500 Andrew Buckley +44 (0)20 7643 9315 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 SFI / IPD Swedish Long term Property Index Report £2500 Christina Gustafsson +46 (0)850 565231 South Africa Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Richard Wetherell Stan Garrun +44 (0)20 7643 9266 +27 11 883 0679 Property Investors Digest 1500 Richard Wetherell +44 (0)20 7643 9266 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 Canada Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Phil Tily +44 (0)20 7643 9311 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 Quarterly Digest $5000 Ca Phil Tily +44 (0)20 7643 9311 Denmark Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Andrew Buckley +44 (0)20 7643 9315 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 Norway Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Andrew Buckley +44 (0)20 7643 9315 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 Spain Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Julia Marciano +33 1580 53682 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 Portugal Order Form (pdf) Portfolio Analysis Service Quote from: Luis Francisco Antonio Gil Machado +44 (0)20 7643 9318 +35 19 3973 6055 Remuneration Service Brochure Quote from: Vida Godson +44 (0)20 7643 9300 1 St. John's Lane London EC1M 4BL Tel: +44 (0)20 7336 9200 Fax: +44 (0)20 7336 9399 Privacy Policy | © 2005 IPD Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Home | About IPD | Portfolio Analysis Service | Events | Indices and Market Information | Indices for Derivatives | OPD Designed by Webrepro