home mortgage programs since

AAMI.net offers Option Arm MTA Index and COFI and COSI and CODI and LIBOR real estate mortgages American Advantage Mortgage, Inc. (AAMI) is an on-line deep discount Mortgage Broker specializing in Option Arm mortgages including the MTA Index and Cost of Funds Index (COFI), Cost of Savings Index (COSI), the LIBOR Index and CODI Index real estate home mortgage programs since 1993. AAMI has a dedicated turn-key system which will Educate, Process, and Close your refinance mortgage or first mortgage in the shortest amount of time. AAMI is one of the original internet Mortgage finance companies going online in early 1995. By keeping our phone calls and overhead down, we can offer competitive rates and fees, but still offer personalized service via the Internet utilizing e-mails, Live-Chat, e-faxes, LTrack and our website. One of our main goals is to educate our potential Borrowers on their chosen mortgage program before, during, and after Settlement by continually updating our website with relevant information concerning each mortgage program. Last year AAMI closed over $16,000,000 in Option ARM mortgages without physically meeting a single client; communication was mainly via e-mails. We didnt start out as an internet company, though. Having worked in the mortgage industry for years, our people bring a level of expertise, professionalism and customer service that other internet companies simply cant match. As an internet company run by mortgage professionals, we can offer you the chance to refinance or purchase your home online at substantial savings over traditional mortgage or banking retailers. Obviously, you will save more money by gaining as much information as possible about your potential mortgage terms and Conditions and Closing Cost before your commit to a certain mortgage Broker or Banker. That is why we have placed the actual cost including the Margin, Life Cap, Points, etc. for all to see; there is no guessing and no sales calls. HOME ABOUT US INDEX MORTGAGES INSPIRED DESIGN WEB SITE DESIGN

Property Search | Property

New Skys - the easiest way to search for overseas property New Skys Home My Portfolio New Skys Magazine Properties of the Week New Skys News Feedback Site Map Advanced Search NewSkys Forum Currency Converter Maps Weather Select a Country Tell a Friend Click here to subscribe to New Skys News, our FREE weekly newsletter. Featuring: Our Top Story The latest property news Articles and Properties of the Week Email ALERT! It has come to our attention that there are a number of emails circulating, purporting to come from New Skys. Read More Contact NewSkys Head Office 18 The Green, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1PX Tel: +44 845 330 1449 info@newskys.co.uk Currently featuring 22,524 properties and 1,790 articles Whatever kind of overseas property you are looking to buy,a detailed search on New Skys is the quickest way to find it. A new way to sell overseas property, click here to view powerpoint presentation (1MB). We now cover Australia , Barbados , Bulgaria , Canada , China , Costa Rica , Crete , Croatia , Cyprus , Dominican Republic , Florida , France , Greece/Greek Islands , Hungary , Italy , Malta , Montenegro , Morocco , Northern Cyprus , Portugal , Slovakia , Slovenia , South Africa , Spain , Thailand , Turkey , and United Arab Emirates . - and there's even a Magazine section to give you background information and help you through the buying process. How to Advertise with us One of the best starting points for anyone looking for a home abroad is to attend as many exhibitions as possible. But where do you find the details in advance? Who knows when there's a show in your area? New Skys News does. Simply click here and before you know it you'll be stepping through the front door of your new home. Read more The white stuff Read more Costa Blanca investment Read more Dubai in detail Read more Successful pitch Read more Where on Earth? A different type of matchmaking service Read more Archive Property News Location: FETHIYE, TURKEY Price: FROM £170,000 FETHIYE, TURKEY Given the time of year, Turkey could not be a more appropriate destination to consider and you are unlikely to be bored with the country by Boxing Day – unlike the feathered variety! In fact, there’s so much to do and see in Turkey owning a home there will feel like Christmas Day every day. For a start, there are stunning beaches with great water sports and endless hours of sunshine, wonderful well-priced local restaurants, and for the history buffs among you, the area is chock-a-block with ancient monuments. Read More Location: MONACO, FRANCE Price: FROM €110,000 (£75,000) MONACO, FRANCE Monaco is the crème de la crème. This tax haven on the French Riviera is so upmarket and star-studded even A-list celebrities don’t automatically receive five-start treatment. Its hotels are sumptuous, its port and yachts within it are luxurious and its casino is known the world over. Wandering its streets down beside the marina, so pristine and perfect is everything, you could be forgiven for feeling you are in a commercial. But this is reality and perhaps surprisingly folk like us can afford to rub shoulders with the super rich. Read More Location: CLERMONT, ORLANDO Price: $319,900 (£187,500) CLERMONT, ORLANDO, FLORIDA Florida continues to beat the doom mongers who prophesy that its property market is overheated. Performing well (30% growth annualised in 2005) and being second only to Texas this year, the United States’ southernmost state continues to draw visitors and homebuyers to its shores. Read More Location: CARVOEIRO, ALGARVE, PORTUGAL Price: FROM €103,000 (£71,000) CARVOEIRO, ALGARVE, PORTUGAL The Algarve is an evergreen destination with British property buyers. While other areas and countries fall in and out of fashion, the Algarve continues to promise and deliver high quality properties on a stunning Atlantic coastline that enjoys over 300 days of sunshine annually. Carvoeiro, located only a 40-minute drive from Faro International Airport, is ideally situated on the Algarve to offer all that is best about the region. Read More Select a property type... Apartment / Condominium Villa / Detached House Town House Plot Only Country House / Finca Price Range in local currency Min... 50,000 100,000 175,000 250,000 350,000 500,000 750,000 1,000,000 Max... 50,000 100,000 175,000 250,000 350,000 500,000 750,000 1,000,000 Select number of bedrooms... 1 Bedroom 2 Bedrooms 3 Bedrooms 4 Bedrooms 5 Bedrooms 6 Bedrooms Select a territory... Australia Barbados Bulgaria Canada China Costa Rica Crete Croatia Cyprus Dominican Republic Florida France Greece/Greek Islands Hungary Italy Malta Montenegro Morocco Northern Cyprus Portugal Slovakia Slovenia South Africa Spain Thailand Turkey United Arab Emirates Select a region... Argentina: Argentina Australia: New South Wales Australia: Northern Territories Australia: Queensland Australia: South Australia Australia: Tasmania Australia: Victoria Australia: Western Australia Barbados: Barbados Brazil: Brazil Bulgaria: Central Balkan Mountains Bulgaria: North coast/Varna Bulgaria: Rest of Bulgaria Bulgaria: Ski resorts Bulgaria: Sofia City and region Bulgaria: South coast/Bourgas Canada: Alberta Canada: British Columbia Canada: New Brunswick Canada: Newfoundland Canada: Northwest Territories Canada: Nova Scotia Canada: Ontario Canada: Prince Edward Island Canada: Quebec Canada: Rest of Canada Canada: Saskatchewan Cape Verde Islands: Cape Verde Islands China: Shanghai Costa Rica: Costa Rica Crete: Crete Croatia: Croatia Cyprus: Larnaca Area Cyprus: Limassol Area Cyprus: Pafos Area Cyprus: Rest of Cyprus Czech Republic: Czech Republic Czech Republic: Czech Republic Dominican Republic: Dominican Republic Estonia: Estonia Florida: Central Florida - Orlando/Disney Florida: Gulf Coast Florida: Keys Florida: Miami Area Florida: Rest of Florida France: Alsace France: Aquitaine France: Auvergne France: Brittany France: Burgundy France: Centre France: Champagne-Ardenne France: Charente France: Corsica France: Languedoc Roussillon France: Limousin France: Loire France: Lorraine France: Midi-Pyrnes France: Nord - Pas de Calais France: Normandy France: Paris / Ile de France France: Pays de la Loire France: Picardie France: Poitou Charentes France: Provence France: Provence - Cote d'Azur France: Rest of France France: Rhne Alpes Greece/Greek Islands: Greece Greece/Greek Islands: Zante / Zakynthos Hungary: Budapest India: Goa Italy: Rest of Italy Italy: Sardinia Italy: Sicily Italy: Tuscany Las Vegas: Las Vegas Malaysia: Malaysia Malta: Gozo Malta: Malta Montenegro: Montenegro Morocco: Morocco Morocco: Morocco New Zealand: New Zealand Northern Cyprus: Northern Cyprus Panama: Panama Philippines: Philippines Philippines: Philippines Portugal: Algarve East of Faro Portugal: Algarve Faro and West Portugal: Azores Portugal: Central Algarve Portugal: Inland Algarve Portugal: Madeira Portugal: Rest of Portugal Slovakia: Slovakia Slovenia: Slovenia South Africa: Eastern Cape South Africa: Kwa-Zulu Natal South Africa: Northern Cape South Africa: South Africa: Other South Africa: Western Cape Spain: Basque Country Spain: Cantabria Spain: Catalonia Spain: Costa Blanca: Alicante and South Spain: Costa Blanca: Inland Spain: Costa Blanca: North of Alicante Spain: Costa Brava Spain: Costa Calida Spain: Costa de Almeria Spain: Costa de la Luz Spain: Costa del Azahar Spain: Costa del Sol: East of Malaga Spain: Costa del Sol: Inland Spain: Costa del Sol: Malaga to Marbella Spain: Costa del Sol: West of Marbella Spain: Costa Dorada Spain: Galicia Spain: Ibiza Spain: Major Spanish Cities Spain: Mallorca Spain: Menorca Spain: Other Balearic Islands Spain: Other Canary Islands Spain: Rest of Spain Spain: Rural Spain Spain: The Canaries: Fuerteventura Spain: The Canaries: Gran Canaria Spain: The Canaries: La Gomera Spain: The Canaries: Lanzarote Spain: The Canaries: Tenerife St. Lucia: St. Lucia Thailand: Thailand Thailand: Thailand The West Indies: Saint Martin The West Indies: Turks & Caicos Islands Tobago: Tobago Turkey: Altinkum Turkey: Antalya Turkey: Bodrum Peninsula Turkey: Dalaman-Dalyan Turkey: Fethiye Turkey: Kalkan Turkey: Kusadasi Turkey: Rest of Turkey United Arab Emirates: Dubai United Arab Emirates: Ras Al Kaimah Enter Keywords: Home | Property Search | Property News | Featured Properties | Buyers Info | Useful Contacts | Exhibition Search | Overseas Property Club | Contact Us Designed by Internet Dreams , SW © NewSkys . All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions . Privacy Policy .

Buy House Plans -

Before You Buy House Plans - What you need to know  You are here: About > Home & Garden > Architecture > Find Products & Services > Building Plans > How To Select House Plans > Before You Buy House Plans - What you need to know Home & Garden Architecture Essentials Architecture Basics About Your House School & Career FAQ Research Guide ASK US Articles & Resources Design & Build Remodel & Restore Find Products & Services Research Your Home Great Buildings Famous Architects Construction Facts Periods & Styles Theories & Approaches Health & Environment Cities & Landscapes Travel & Museums School & Career Lessons & Activities Reference Tools Buyer's Guide Great Architecture Gifts Fun Gifts For Guys Frank Lloyd Wright Gifts House Plans Home Design Software Forums Help FREE Newsletter Sign Up Now for the Architecture newsletter! See Online Courses   Search Architecture Stay up to date! Email to a friend Print this page Suggested Reading Find Plans For Your Dream Home House Plans Library What is a "Floor Plan"? What are "Stock Plans"? Related Guide Picks Before You Build Before You Remodel Most Popular Home Design Software Programs House Styles and Home Architecture Picking House Colors Craftsman Bungalow House Style Tools to Help You Choose Ho... What's Hot Do Buildings Have Sex 4 Ways of Perceiving Building Contract Home Design Trends Bungalow Floor Plans - Sears - Modern Home No. c250, The Ash... Architecture - Articles Related Topics Art History Construction Industry Interior Decorating Home Repair Archaeology Before You Buy House Plans From Jackie Craven , Your Guide to Architecture . FREE Newsletter. Sign Up Now! Every new home begins with a plan. Some homebuyers hire an architect to create a custom design. Others purchase stock plans from a building plans publisher. Which option is right for you? Begin your search by exploring these five options. Browse Through Catalogs You will find thousands of stock building plans in hefty catalogs which include floor plans and elevation drawings. If you see a house you like, you can order complete construction drawings. • Top House Plan Collections Surf The Web Many house plan publishers have Web sites with powerful search engines to help you find plans for the size and style you seek. Listed here are our favorites. • House Plan Publishers on the Web Go Back In Time Do you favor the old, traditional styles? Why not look at the original building plans used in days gone by? These plans won't have the detailed specifications you need to construct your home, but they are a good starting place for recreating historic designs. • Victorian House Plans • Bungalow Floor Plans Draw Your Own Even if you can't draw a straight line, you can use these computer programs to create floor plans and 3-D views for your dream house. • Easy Home Design Computer Software Programs Get Help From Pros Most homeowners who purchase stock plans find that they need to make a few alterations. Sometimes, the stock plan is merely a starting point for creating an original design. Who do you hire? • Do you need an architect? • What is a Professional Building Designer? • What is a Custom Home Builder?        Topic Index | Email to a Friend Our Story | Be a Guide | Advertising Info | Work at About | Site Map | Icons | Help User Agreement | Ethics Policy | Patent Info. | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy ©2005 About, Inc., A part of the New York Times Company . All rights reserved. Around About Oprah's Life Vacation Ideas Shop Safely Online VIDEO: Craft Rooms VIDEO: Christmas Traditions What's Hot Do Buildings Have Sex 4 Ways of Perceiving Building Contract Home Design Trends Bungalow Floor Plans - Sears - Modern Home No. c250, The Ash... Architecture - Articles

real estate prices in

MemeFirst: New York real-estate prices explained -- MemeFirst December 01, 2005 New York real-estate prices explained The 2.2 million jobs in Manhattan pay, on average, $2,025 per week . (You know that feeling you get when you find out you're below average? I've been having that for years.) Manhattan is 22 square miles, which means that the island of Manhattan pays, on average, $378 per square foot per year . And that includes Washington Heights. Posted by Felix at 02:54 PM GMT All proceeds go to MSF -- Comments #1 Pity we can't all work for Goldman Sachs. Posted by: Gherimiah on December 1, 2005 03:28 PM #2 I'll happily defer to someone with a firmer grasp of stats on this, but in the meantime, I wonder, does that average income number tell you very much? Given the massive disparity in Manhattan incomes, between, say, the dishwasher and the hedge-fund owner, which surely are among the widest in the country, wouldn't you also need to know the distribution of the data points? At a minium, wouldn't you want also to know the median income? Also, is this net or gross? Article talked about paychecks, which could probably mean either. Posted by: Matthew on December 1, 2005 04:36 PM #3 Oh, and also, Felix, presumably the 2.2 million people with jobs in Manhattan don't all live there, so your extrapolation doesn't wash. Posted by: Matthew on December 1, 2005 04:38 PM #4 Obvs mean incomemedian income, and I'd be surprised if more than 40% of Manhattanites made above average. Probably less. But even so. And actually, the fact that there are 2.2 million jobs to 1.5 million people in Manhattan actually only serves to exacerbate the demand-supply imbalance when it comes to real estate. Posted by: Felix on December 1, 2005 04:53 PM #5 I hate to be the one to break this to you, Felix, but nearly all residential housing in Manhattan consists of multi-story buildings. The salary range you describe explains real estate prices in Westchester County, NY and Bergen County, NJ to about the same degree as prices in Manhattan. Posted by: Sterling on December 1, 2005 07:05 PM #6 How delightful that the discussion of property prices one is sometimes unable to defuse at dinner parties just carries on here - almost as if taunting one with its dreary ineluctability. And how nice that Felix should bring along his no doubt expert appreciation of statistical lore. The one thing I am missing is the crucial evaluation of bedbug incidence as it affects property prices in Manhattan. In another thread, Betty has said this bedbug malarkey is all a plan of Bush's. For myself, I prefer to recall that bedbugs tend to originate in Belgium. Schtumm for now. More on this later. Posted by: Claude de Bigny on December 1, 2005 08:40 PM #7 Also, this seems to imply that everyone pays all of their income for housing, which is hopefully not the case. To be more realistic (ignoring the issues rightly brought up by the other commentators, including whether all of those people actually live in Manhattan and whether you can just take the sq ftge of Manhattan as the residential sq ftge), say people on average spend 40% of their income on housing. That gets your income for housing per sq ft to around $151. Posted by: Susan on December 1, 2005 09:14 PM #8 Susan and Sterling, you are embarassingly confused. What percentage of real estate in Manhattan is used for housing? According to this http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/landusefacts/landuse_tables.pdf (in case you are confused by the graph, the percents sum together veritcally and the land area sum horizontally). And even assuming that all "Mixed Residential and Commercial" was used for housing, less than 38% of the land in Manhattan is for housing. These data certainly allow for the idea that much of rent paid in Manhattan is for commercial use, and even then, a considerable percent is used for public space (Central Park alone is 10% of the area of Manhattan). Anyway, the amount people earn in a particular location is not directly related to the amount the people who live there earn, or the amount the people live there pay for rent. Look at this site: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/saipe/index.html The direct link is unavailable, but the Median household income for New York County was 43,573. Nassau County on the other hand is more than 71,000. In which place is it cheaper to rent by the foot? Posted by: Andrew on December 2, 2005 07:22 AM #9 I don't think I'm confused. My points are: a) there is actually quite a bit more than 22 square miles of residential floor space in Manhattan because of vertical construction b) a lot of upper-income Manhattan workers live outside Manhattan, and their buying power lifts prices in tony bedroom communities Posted by: Sterling on December 3, 2005 03:38 PM #10 OK, Sterling, let's do it your way. Assume that each of the 1.5 million residents of Manhattan has 400 square feet to call their own: that works out to 1200 square feet for the average family of three and 1600 square feet for the average family of four. Generous, I'd say. That comes out to 600 million square feet of residential real estate in Manhattan. Using that figure, my calculation actually comes out slightly higher : $386 per square foot per year, rather than $378. What makes you think that there's more than 22 square miles of residential floor space in Manhattan? As for your point b, I fail to see how it is in any way germane. Posted by: Felix on December 3, 2005 11:09 PM #11 OK, 22 square miles equals about 613,324,800 square feet. That would leave each of Manhattan's 1.5 million residents with 409 square feet of living space. But I don't believe that most Manhattan residents are actually so deprived, especially when you take into account common areas in apartment buildings such as laundry facilities, hallways, lobbies, etc. I'd be surprised if the average wasn't at least 600, and it's probably more than 800. And besides, that's not what you originally meant - you were dividing Manhattan's land footprint and not taking into account its vertical expansion. As for the second point, I suspect there's a strong tendency among $100,000 - $1,000,000 per annum Manhattan earners - which is well-off to wealthy-on-a-budget - to live in places like Valhalla and Ho-Ho-Kus, especially if they're married with kids. Family-flight in turn increases the average per-capita-square-footage of the Manhattan residential footprint through bleed-off of children. Posted by: Sterling on December 4, 2005 02:29 AM #12 Sterling jumped the shark so long ago it's probably not surprising, but for those of you keeping score at home, he really did just say that the average Manhattanite has 800 square feet of their own. So if you're an average person living with 2 roommates, that means you're in a 2400 square foot apartment. In Manhattan. Yeah. Oh, and that 350 square foot apartment you've got? It's not 350 square feet at all, it's probably more than 4000 square feet. You're just not including the lobby and all the hallways. Posted by: Felix on December 4, 2005 02:43 AM #13 My claim is that the amount of residential-zoned floor space in Manhattan probably works out to between 600 and 800 square feet per resident of Manhattan. You're not only challenging this, but asserting that my claim is absurd. Sure you wanna do that? Posted by: Sterling on December 4, 2005 02:59 AM #14 I've tried to find the statistic, but to no avail. It seems that while office space inventor is measured in square footage, residential space is simply measured, in all documents, by units. But we can work with that. So far I've learned that 82% of zoned lots in Manhattan are residential, making up about 280,000,000 square feet, which includes permanently undeveloped spaces like yards and gardens. If the average height of development across all that land is four stories, then, we're looking at about 750 square feet per person. I've also learned that in 1999 there were about 727,000 residential units in Manhattan , which means that the average unit houses two people. So those three-roomies crammed into one 800-square-foot-tenement-with-the-bathtub-in-the-kitchen examples are mostly fiction. Which is a shame because I get a tingle from the mental picture of Manhattan twenty- and thirty-somethings living in cramped, dingy conditions. If we divide the total residential land area by the total number of units, we get 385 square feet, which works out to 192.5 square feet per person, assuming no dwellings above one story in height and no unimproved/vacant land. If the average height is assumed to be four stories, in this scenario we get about 770 square feet per person. Here's a report from Prudential Douglas Elliman that details its 1Q 2005 sales. Units sold averaged 1,334 square feet, which divided by two yields 767 square feet per person. Breaking it down further we find co-ops averaging 1,197 square feet, condos at 1,496 square feet, luxury at 2,921 and loft at 2,145. So that's 598.5 square feet per person at the low end all the way up to 1,460.5 at the top. There's three separate analytical models for you Felix, all of which yield per-person square footage of 750 or better. I admit they're not all that fleshed out, but I'm stuck inside with a cold watching The Taking of Pelham One-Two-Three on DVD, and I'm disinclined to dig deeper. But you're welcome to. Posted by: Sterling on December 4, 2005 04:04 AM #15 Sterling: do your calculations include infrastructure or is the 280MM number a percentage of raw space? Building density is higher here than anywhere else in America, but 15% to circulation (in buildings and streets themeselves) would be an easily defended metric. Counting hallways in urban residential structures is like counting sidewalks as part of sf for suburban homes. As much Sterling does sound like a set designer for Friends, Felix, I gotta say, of the 25 or so apartments of people that I can definitely make an estimate of size, we average 500 sf easy. Most everyone is a half a standard tenement lot (25 x 25), with a couple of lofts and post-war, large-scale developments thrown in. This is skewed because many of them are single (I live in a 2bd alone) or have rent-controlled apartments from way back. Posted by: 99 on December 4, 2005 07:19 PM #16 Where does your 280m sq ft number come from? Your first two calculations are based on it, so I'd like to know. (They're also based on a multiplier of 4, which as far as I can tell came pretty much out of thin air.) As for apartment sales, in Manhattan individual condos and coops tend to be much larger than the apartments inside rental buildings. So if you look just at sold apartments as opposed to rented apartments, you're going to get a skewed figure. What's more, if a 3800-square-foot brownstone in Harlem, say, is sold and then the downstairs floor is rented out, that still counts as a 3800 square foot deal under these figures. Posted by: Felix on December 4, 2005 09:21 PM #17 The multiplier of 4 was back-of-envelope guess. The 280,000,000 number came from this PDF . Sorry, thought I'd linked to it initially. As for rental apartments being smaller than privately owned condos or co-ops...not sure I buy that. But even if it's true, how much smaller could they be? 10%? Doesn't really matter. You can apologize any time now. Posted by: Sterling on December 4, 2005 10:06 PM #18 if anyone is real curious why not pony up the $250 to get a list of every tax lot in the city? http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/bytes/applbyte.shtml in the meantime, simply because i am tired of having to read sterlings pontifications about things he knows anything about, i downloaded a list of all the residential tax lots from 14th street and below from propertyshark. only 14th street and below, because after 6000+ entries, i became bored. 14th street down is a good representative sample of the 99000+ residential tax lots in manhattan. it includes spacious luxury lofts of tribeca, tenements of the les, projects on the eastside, high rise high density battery park and half building condo conversions of downtown (note that a rental bldg with multiple units counts as a single tax lot with the number of units listed as a seperate data field). the average unit size works out to 1100sf with 590sf per person (based 2000 census population stats for 14th st & below). this includes all common space in a building as it is based on total building size for single tax lot (rental) buildings and counts common space tax lots for condo buildings (read lobbies, circ, etc.) multiplying back out by the 2000 census population numbers for manhattan of 1,537,195... we get 906,945,050sf of residential space in manhattan. let's call that an even 9Bsf since the city lists 3800 acres of lot area in manhattan (165,500,000sf), that gives a rough overbuild factor of 5.5. this will obviously skew higher with the ues & uws densities without actually affecting the sf/person. summary- -590sf of residential per person (inclusive of common areas). close to sterlings low estimate of 600, but nowhere near the 800sf -1100sf average size per unit (inclusive of common areas). again close to sterlings guess based on broker mumbojumbo, but still below the stated average. -9Bsf of residential space in manhattan sterling- close on your numbers, but not nearly close enough to be quite so pompously smug. stick to things you know about, like why bush is a foreign policy genius. felix- remind me what this related to? Posted by: geoff on December 5, 2005 12:34 AM #19 Geoff - The only reason I was pompously snug is because Felix had reacted to to my estimates with such comedic outrage. Also, I don't think 14th St. and below is a good representative sample. Newer and I suspect more spacious high-rises make up a much larger proportion of housing from the 30s up through the low 100s. So I'm sticking with 600+. I suspect the actual number is around 750, as stated above. As for your justification of your work - "simply because i am tired of having to read sterlings pontifications about things he knows anything about" - I'm not sure what it means. Perhaps you meant to write "nothing" instead of "anything"? I'm not claiming to be right all the time - I am not right all the time. I am, however, pretty much always right whenever Felix gets all worked up and tells me I have no idea what I'm talking about. Thanks for your small role in marking off another example for me to throw back at him at some future date. Posted by: Sterling on December 5, 2005 06:19 AM #20 Renter-occupied apartments are much smaller than owner-occupied apartments. And as the PDF you yourself linked to shows (see page 24), the vast majority of apartments in Manhattan are renter-occupied. Think about it: one needs maybe 350 sq ft per person to live in some reasonable comfort. Beyond that, you're shelling out extra cash for extra space. Owners are happy doing that because they have 100% equity in that space: everyone has heard the advice that they should buy the biggest apartment they can afford. Renters, on the other hand, are simply giving away thousands of dollars in rent every month, with nothing at all to show for it. So they tend to go not for the biggest apartment they can afford, but rather the cheapest apartment they find adequate. Put it this way: Manhattan is full of individuals spending an enormous proportion of their income on outsize mortgage payments. Almost everyone, when they move from renting to buying, sees their monthly housing costs rise substantially. If you move to Manhattan and have a relatively low income, then you might spend a crazy amount of it on rent, it's true. But if your income is average or higher (and remember that average is $2,025 per week), I very much doubt that your rent is making nearly as much of a dent in your paycheck as it would if you owned your own apartment. You reach a standard of living you're comfortable with, and you stop. Anything beyond that is money which you could otherwise spend on clothes, or travel, or restaurants. Whereas if you buy , you're not spending so much as investing. The only money which you're really spending is the interest on your mortgage -- and even that comes with a tax deduction. Or let's put it another way. That Elliman report you linked to has an average sales price of $1.21 million. A typical rental yield in Manhattan these days is 4%, so if rentals were functionally identical to owner-occupied apartments, which you seem to assume, then the average rent in Manhattan would be over $4,000 a month. In fact, of course, it's nowhere near that. Posted by: Felix on December 5, 2005 06:55 AM #21 There's the shark, and then there's the A train. Sterling's Manhattan clearly stops at 96th street. Sterling, dear, north of that bright white line, the housing stock is incredibly stable and consistent in terms of size and layout. Harlem is just now getting it's first 'luxury' apartment building in a half century. Any larger apartment complexes are housing projects, which have smaller units by definition, and, allowing for the dispersal of the towers in some International Style fantasy also insures that the density does not increase much. Posted by: 99 on December 5, 2005 04:03 PM #22 Felix, just because apartments are currently going for $1.21 million a pop doesn't mean that everyone who owns an apartment paid that much. Rent prices move in sympathy with real estate prices but are less prone to bubbles. What you're missing here, and you've missed the same thing when we've talked about the stock market in the past, is the difference between speculative investors and income investors. Speculators don't buy an apartment (or apartment building) primarily for the benefit of the rent; their main motivation is the hope of flipping the property at some later date for a larger sum than they paid for it. The current Manhattan real estate bubble is the product of speculators. Real estate income investors view rent collection as their goal - most apartment buildings in any town or city in the U.S. are owned by income investors. They get less press than speculators, but they also tend to go bankrupt less often. The market value of a rental property can be determined by the amount of rent it generates for the owner, not the other way around. Manhattan rents are high - probably even ludicrously high - but that is a function of large demand chasing relatively low supply, and is only weakly related to current real estate prices. I do acknowledge your point about space not being a priority for Manhattan renters, there is some truth in that. People who do see space as a necessity tend to wind up in rental units in Brooklyn, Queens or Hudson County. But that's not exclusively the case. Posted by: Sterling on December 5, 2005 04:59 PM #23 This thread is hilarious and sad, although a good example of how the same statistics can be applied to support any and all political positions. Posted by: sac on December 5, 2005 06:39 PM #24 Sterling, Manhattan is the one real-estate market in the US where there are, to all intents and purposes, zero speculators under your definition. No one buys Manhattan property in order to flip it. For one thing, co-op boards (and even condo boards, for that matter) hate flippers, and are likely to punish them. There's flip taxes, brokers' fees of 6% for the seller, and a luxury tax of 1% on any apartment over $1m for the buyer. Prices are so high that the carrying costs are enormous -- and you can't rent out the apartment in the meantime, because that makes it pretty much unsaleable. There are, of course, lots of buildings owned by income investors in New York. Most of the East Village, where I live, is comprised of such buildings: they normally have 20 or so apartments (say 5 floors, 4 apartments per floor), and they've been going up in price almost as much as individual apartments have -- the only reason they haven't gone up just as much is because many of the tenants are rent-controlled or rent-stabilised below market. These are typical New York apartments, from a renter's point of view -- but I can tell you, as someone who was apartment hunting in the East Village for almost a year, they're much less typical from an owner's point of view. Also, there's a strong incentive for for-sale apartments to be as large as possible: price per square foot is positively correlated with size. That's not the case in the rental market: it's easier to rent out a 650sqft apartment for $2500 than it is to rent out a 1300sqft apartment for $5000. Posted by: Felix on December 5, 2005 09:14 PM #25 "Manhattan is the one real-estate market in the US where there are, to all intents and purposes, zero speculators under your definition. No one buys Manhattan property in order to flip it." Felix, of course people speculate on property in Manhattan. Just because the barriers to entry are high doesn't mean some won't jump them. How else do you think a modest apartment winds up costing as much as a dozen Mercedes-Benz CL500s? Who do you imagine is providing demand at that level? You know banks are not issuing $1,000,000 mortgages to households with joint incomes of $200,000. It's trust fund kiddies - who are often divorced from fiscal reality - and speculators. As for your point about different-sized apartments being suitable for rent versus sale, I might agree with you except for the fact that every rental apartment IS OWNED by someone. It IS PART of the for sale market. I'd be surprised if fewer than half of the condos in Manhattan are rented out by their owners. Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 01:51 AM #26 Sterling, I'm afraid the factors leading to high apartment prices are much more mundane than your feverish mind would like to imagine. Lots of global liquidity, driving down interest rates and banks' credit tests. Lots of demand, due to Manhattan's status as the center of the universe and high Wall Street bonuses. And very limited supply. The market for flippers is Miami, not NYC -- where a condo can be bought and sold three or four times before it is even built. As for your point about rental apartments being owned by someone, it sounds clever until you stop to think about what I've already said. Rental buildings are owned by landlords; the vast majority of condos and co-ops are owner-occupied. For one thing, co-ops vastly outnumber condos, and they're hard to rent. And as for condos, they generally get rented out when they're not the place their owner really wants to live. Given how valuable they are, few owners who don't want to live here would rather rent out their condos rather than simply sell them. Take my East Village condo building, for instance: when it went condo in 1983, only one owner lived here. Today, all the units bar one are owner-occupied. I haven't done my homework on this, but I'll happily accept your wager: I'll bet the standard bottle of vintage champagne that more than half the condos in Manhattan are owner-occupied. Deal? Posted by: Felix on December 6, 2005 02:43 AM #27 If you go double or nothing on the proposition that the amount of existing residential floor space in Manhattan divided by the number of residents of Manhattan is equal to or greater than 600 sq. ft., then it's a bet. How are we going to research this? FWIW, I am descended from a man who is reputed to be the first person to negotiate a real estate deal in New York: Wessel Wesselse (ten Broek). He may have been the man to offer 60 guilders (often misreported as $24) as the purchase price of Manhattan from the Canarsies. (Technically the Canarsies didn't own Manhattan Island - it's not for nothing that "Canarsie" is in Brooklyn. Also technically the Dutch West India Company didn't care which tribe owned it. It just needed some bunch of natives to smile and sign off on the deal to keep the English away.) This of course conveys no special knowledge upon me, but it certainly adds a humorous subtext to our disagreement. Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 04:14 AM #28 I'm not sure about the terms of the wager: we seem to be betting on two different things at the same time. But spell it out, and I'll be amenable. I do want to ensure, of course, that hallways and elevator shafts and the like do not count as residential floor space. And please also ensure that if one of the propositions can be determined while the other one can't, then the other wager still stands. Posted by: Felix on December 6, 2005 05:55 AM #29 I'm not sure how we could specify the terms to exclude elevators if they are included in filings. However, it occurs to me that Manhattan Borough probably requires a statement of total dwelling space for its Certificate of Occupancy, so that would work for me. And no, I think double or nothing sounds good to me, especially since we will be attempting to falsify two of my estimations, rather than either of yours. Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 06:20 AM #30 You've lost me, I'm afraid. When you say "double or nothing", are you proposing a 2BVC bet on the residential floor space, and no bet at all on the proportion of condos which are rented out? Or what? It makes no sense to me: "double or nothing" normally happens after A has lost a bet and B has won it. Then going double or nothing means that either B wins double the original amount, or he wins nothing. You essentially run the bet over again. Are you maybe trying to propose something whereby if I lose I lose 2BVCs, and if I win I win nothing? Posted by: Felix on December 6, 2005 07:44 AM #31 Are you trying to squirm out of it? Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 06:03 PM #32 Sterling, will you propose your bet already? I've already said that I'm likely to accept. Just tell me the terms! Posted by: Felix on December 6, 2005 06:12 PM #33 I did! Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 06:25 PM #34 OK, have a few moments now, I had to get someplace before 2pm and the roads are crap with snow and slush. Um, OK. My terms for the bet is those two things specified, avg. sq. footage = 600 and = 50% of condos. Either side has to get both right to collect. gotta run Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 06:51 PM #35 So if one of us gets both right, he wins 1BVC or 2BVCs? And if one of the two turns out to be unverifiable, then it's a wash? Posted by: Felix on December 6, 2005 07:22 PM #36 Honestly, Felix, I doubt either number is verifiable. Like I wrote above, the city appears to track residential rental inventory by units, rather than by square footage. Also, most owners of condominium units who rent them out do so through agents - even the tenant may be only vaguely aware of the legal status of the unit. In NJ I don't think an individual condo owner even needs to report the unit as a rental property if it's in a building that's already inspected under multi-family housing regulations (or if it's a standalone unit or duplex). The rent revenue has to be reported as taxable income, naturallly, but not to any entity with housing oversight. So make it for one bottle and yes both figures have to be verifiable. That said, if either of us can show a grouping of not-completely-conclusive figures from multiple sources that seem reasonable and fall long or short of my guesses by ten percent or more, then I think we should accept them. (Of course, I have arguably already met this condition with my square footage prediction, and Geoff's calculations don't contradict it under the 10% rule I suggest.) Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 10:05 PM #37 as i mentioned earlier, you can get the sf and unit count for every residential tax lot in the city from the cities web site... google 'bytes of the big apple' and look at the 'pluto' product. the license fee is $250 or you can get the info from propertyshark.com. there are 99000+ listings for manhattan. at 100 listings per page, thats a lot of cutting and pasting into excel. both of these will give you tax lot sizes (whole buildings/unit count or condo unit), which will be inclusive of common area. 10-15% is considered a fairly standard deduction for circulation. mechanical space is not included in the floor area count. happy dueling Posted by: geoff on December 6, 2005 10:29 PM Post a comment Name: Email Address: URL: Remember personal info? Yes No Anti-spam question: Share four cupcakes equally among four people. How many does each person get (in digits)? Comments: XML Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0 Sources Eurof Felix Jame Michelle Mike Sage7 Stefan Sterling &c. Disclaimer Archive 12/05 11/05 10/05 09/05 08/05 07/05 06/05 05/05 04/05 03/05 02/05 01/05 12/04 11/04 10/04 09/04 08/04 07/04 06/04 05/04 04/04 03/04 02/04 01/04 12/03 11/03 10/03 09/03 Old site Recent posts 08/12: Not man enough (1) 08/12: Fare's fair (0) 07/12: Briddishisms (5) 06/12: The Trial of Saddam (5) 05/12: Leg deficiencies (4) 01/12: New York real-estate prices explained (37) 30/11: Bad vibe (22) 30/11: Thick-headed bouncers (0) 29/11: Argentina's sinister move (2) 28/11: Bedbugs and the city (8) 27/11: I've got a fast card (1) 22/11: Pedestrianize Broadway! (5) 19/11: Century 21 the next casualty at Ground Zero? (23) 19/11: Johnny Depp - sunshine traitor (4) 18/11: Gawker F***** by Yahoo! (7) Comments 06/12: geoff: as i mentioned earlier, you can get the sf and unit count for every residential tax lot in the ci 06/12: Sterling: Honestly, Felix, I doubt either number is verifiable. Like I wrote above, the city appears to tr 06/12: Felix: So if one of us gets both right, he wins 1BVC or 2BVCs? And if one of the two turns out to be unv 06/12: Sterling: OK, have a few moments now, I had to get someplace before 2pm and the roads are crap with snow an 06/12: Sterling: I did! 06/12: Felix: Sterling, will you propose your bet already? I've already said that I'm likely to accept. Just te 06/12: Sterling: Are you trying to squirm out of it? 06/12: Felix: You've lost me, I'm afraid. When you say "double or nothing", are you proposing a 2BVC bet on the 06/12: Sterling: I'm not sure how we could specify the terms to exclude elevators if they are included in filings. 06/12: Felix: I'm not sure about the terms of the wager: we seem to be betting on two different things at the s 06/12: Sterling: If you go double or nothing on the proposition that the amount of existing residential floor spac 06/12: Felix: Sterling, I'm afraid the factors leading to high apartment prices are much more mundane than your 06/12: Sterling: "Manhattan is the one real-estate market in the US where there are, to all intents and purposes, 05/12: Felix: Sterling, Manhattan is the one real-estate market in the US where there are, to all intents and p 05/12: sac: This thread is hilarious and sad, although a good example of how the same statistics can be appli 05/12: Sterling: Felix, just because apartments are currently going for $1.21 million a pop doesn't mean that ever 05/12: 99: There's the shark, and then there's the A train. Sterling's Manhattan clearly stops at 96th stree 05/12: Felix: Renter-occupied apartments are much smaller than owner-occupied apartments. And as the < 05/12: Sterling: Geoff - The only reason I was pompously snug is because Felix had reacted to to my estimates with 05/12: geoff: if anyone is real curious why not pony up the $250 to get a list of every tax lot in the city?<br 04/12: Sterling: The multiplier of 4 was back-of-envelope guess. The 280,000,000 number came from <a href 04/12: Felix: Where does your 280m sq ft number come from? Your first two calculations are based on it, so I'd 04/12: 99: Sterling: do your calculations include infrastructure or is the 280MM number a percentage of raw 04/12: Sterling: I've tried to find the statistic, but to no avail. It seems that while office space inventor is 04/12: Sterling: My claim is that the amount of residential-zoned floor space in Manhattan probably works out to b 04/12: Felix: Sterling jumped the shark so long ago it's probably not surprising, but for those of you keeping 04/12: Sterling: OK, 22 square miles equals about 613,324,800 square feet. That would leave each of Manhattan's 1 03/12: Felix: OK, Sterling, let's do it your way. Assume that each of the 1.5 million residents of Manhattan ha 03/12: Sterling: I don't think I'm confused. My points are: a) there is actually quite a bit more than 22 02/12: Andrew: Susan and Sterling, you are embarassingly confused. What percentage of real estate in Manhattan i Trackbacks

Home Loan Bank of

Home Page Company Info Events/Calendar Financial Information Careers Newsroom Washington Update Publications Resources Benefits Eligibilty Becoming a Member Capital Plan Member Profiles Member Directory FAQ Credit Products MPF Program Securities Services Grant Programs Credit Products Initiatives Applications Procedures Monthly Semiannual History FAQ Disclosure Search    Welcome to the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco Cost of Funds Index October 20053.074% Announced November 30, 2005 Login Username Password Online Security Success Stories Cedars Bank Enjoys Flexibility of CFI Program Provident Finds MPF Program to Be Viable Secondary Market Option United Labor Bank Creates Customer Loyalty A WISH Fulfilled Highlights AHAC Members Announced D. Tad Lowrey To Join Board 2005 Director Election Results Bank Reports Third Quarter Results Bank Announces $20.2 Million in 2005 AHP Round B The Bank awarded $20.2 million in Affordable Housing Program (AHP) grants in 2005 Round B. The funds will support 53 projects, generating 2,938 affordable housing units in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, and Texas. Read More... Homeownership Program Workshops Coming In January The Bank will host six workshops about our homeownership programs, the Individual Development and Empowerment Account (IDEA) and Workforce Initiative Subsidy for Homeownership (WISH) programs. Read More... MPF Program Orientations Set For 2006 Want to learn more about the MPF Program? The Bank will host "Getting Started with the MPF Program" on three dates: January 19 in Los Angeles, June 15 in San Francisco, and November 9 in Phoenix. Read More... Temporary Suspension of Income Limits for Affordable Housing to Aid Hurricane Evacuees In response to the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, the Federal Housing Finance Board has approved a temporary suspension of income limits to allow vacant AHP-assisted rental units to be rented to households, regardless of income, who were displaced as a result of the storm. Read More... Third Quarter 2005 Report Now Available On November 14, 2005, the Bank filed its third quarter 2005 financial report on Form 10-Q with the SEC. The Bank also declared a dividend for the third quarter of 2005 at an annualized rate of 4.58%. Bank Reports Third Quarter Results On November 4, 2005, the Bank announced selected financial results (PDF) for the third quarter of 2005. Bank Announces Projected Dividend Rate On September 27, 2005, the Bank announced its projected dividend rate for the third quarter of 2005. Read More... © 2000-2005 Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco