real estate prices in

MemeFirst: New York real-estate prices explained -- MemeFirst December 01, 2005 New York real-estate prices explained The 2.2 million jobs in Manhattan pay, on average, $2,025 per week . (You know that feeling you get when you find out you're below average? I've been having that for years.) Manhattan is 22 square miles, which means that the island of Manhattan pays, on average, $378 per square foot per year . And that includes Washington Heights. Posted by Felix at 02:54 PM GMT All proceeds go to MSF -- Comments #1 Pity we can't all work for Goldman Sachs. Posted by: Gherimiah on December 1, 2005 03:28 PM #2 I'll happily defer to someone with a firmer grasp of stats on this, but in the meantime, I wonder, does that average income number tell you very much? Given the massive disparity in Manhattan incomes, between, say, the dishwasher and the hedge-fund owner, which surely are among the widest in the country, wouldn't you also need to know the distribution of the data points? At a minium, wouldn't you want also to know the median income? Also, is this net or gross? Article talked about paychecks, which could probably mean either. Posted by: Matthew on December 1, 2005 04:36 PM #3 Oh, and also, Felix, presumably the 2.2 million people with jobs in Manhattan don't all live there, so your extrapolation doesn't wash. Posted by: Matthew on December 1, 2005 04:38 PM #4 Obvs mean incomemedian income, and I'd be surprised if more than 40% of Manhattanites made above average. Probably less. But even so. And actually, the fact that there are 2.2 million jobs to 1.5 million people in Manhattan actually only serves to exacerbate the demand-supply imbalance when it comes to real estate. Posted by: Felix on December 1, 2005 04:53 PM #5 I hate to be the one to break this to you, Felix, but nearly all residential housing in Manhattan consists of multi-story buildings. The salary range you describe explains real estate prices in Westchester County, NY and Bergen County, NJ to about the same degree as prices in Manhattan. Posted by: Sterling on December 1, 2005 07:05 PM #6 How delightful that the discussion of property prices one is sometimes unable to defuse at dinner parties just carries on here - almost as if taunting one with its dreary ineluctability. And how nice that Felix should bring along his no doubt expert appreciation of statistical lore. The one thing I am missing is the crucial evaluation of bedbug incidence as it affects property prices in Manhattan. In another thread, Betty has said this bedbug malarkey is all a plan of Bush's. For myself, I prefer to recall that bedbugs tend to originate in Belgium. Schtumm for now. More on this later. Posted by: Claude de Bigny on December 1, 2005 08:40 PM #7 Also, this seems to imply that everyone pays all of their income for housing, which is hopefully not the case. To be more realistic (ignoring the issues rightly brought up by the other commentators, including whether all of those people actually live in Manhattan and whether you can just take the sq ftge of Manhattan as the residential sq ftge), say people on average spend 40% of their income on housing. That gets your income for housing per sq ft to around $151. Posted by: Susan on December 1, 2005 09:14 PM #8 Susan and Sterling, you are embarassingly confused. What percentage of real estate in Manhattan is used for housing? According to this http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/landusefacts/landuse_tables.pdf (in case you are confused by the graph, the percents sum together veritcally and the land area sum horizontally). And even assuming that all "Mixed Residential and Commercial" was used for housing, less than 38% of the land in Manhattan is for housing. These data certainly allow for the idea that much of rent paid in Manhattan is for commercial use, and even then, a considerable percent is used for public space (Central Park alone is 10% of the area of Manhattan). Anyway, the amount people earn in a particular location is not directly related to the amount the people who live there earn, or the amount the people live there pay for rent. Look at this site: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/saipe/index.html The direct link is unavailable, but the Median household income for New York County was 43,573. Nassau County on the other hand is more than 71,000. In which place is it cheaper to rent by the foot? Posted by: Andrew on December 2, 2005 07:22 AM #9 I don't think I'm confused. My points are: a) there is actually quite a bit more than 22 square miles of residential floor space in Manhattan because of vertical construction b) a lot of upper-income Manhattan workers live outside Manhattan, and their buying power lifts prices in tony bedroom communities Posted by: Sterling on December 3, 2005 03:38 PM #10 OK, Sterling, let's do it your way. Assume that each of the 1.5 million residents of Manhattan has 400 square feet to call their own: that works out to 1200 square feet for the average family of three and 1600 square feet for the average family of four. Generous, I'd say. That comes out to 600 million square feet of residential real estate in Manhattan. Using that figure, my calculation actually comes out slightly higher : $386 per square foot per year, rather than $378. What makes you think that there's more than 22 square miles of residential floor space in Manhattan? As for your point b, I fail to see how it is in any way germane. Posted by: Felix on December 3, 2005 11:09 PM #11 OK, 22 square miles equals about 613,324,800 square feet. That would leave each of Manhattan's 1.5 million residents with 409 square feet of living space. But I don't believe that most Manhattan residents are actually so deprived, especially when you take into account common areas in apartment buildings such as laundry facilities, hallways, lobbies, etc. I'd be surprised if the average wasn't at least 600, and it's probably more than 800. And besides, that's not what you originally meant - you were dividing Manhattan's land footprint and not taking into account its vertical expansion. As for the second point, I suspect there's a strong tendency among $100,000 - $1,000,000 per annum Manhattan earners - which is well-off to wealthy-on-a-budget - to live in places like Valhalla and Ho-Ho-Kus, especially if they're married with kids. Family-flight in turn increases the average per-capita-square-footage of the Manhattan residential footprint through bleed-off of children. Posted by: Sterling on December 4, 2005 02:29 AM #12 Sterling jumped the shark so long ago it's probably not surprising, but for those of you keeping score at home, he really did just say that the average Manhattanite has 800 square feet of their own. So if you're an average person living with 2 roommates, that means you're in a 2400 square foot apartment. In Manhattan. Yeah. Oh, and that 350 square foot apartment you've got? It's not 350 square feet at all, it's probably more than 4000 square feet. You're just not including the lobby and all the hallways. Posted by: Felix on December 4, 2005 02:43 AM #13 My claim is that the amount of residential-zoned floor space in Manhattan probably works out to between 600 and 800 square feet per resident of Manhattan. You're not only challenging this, but asserting that my claim is absurd. Sure you wanna do that? Posted by: Sterling on December 4, 2005 02:59 AM #14 I've tried to find the statistic, but to no avail. It seems that while office space inventor is measured in square footage, residential space is simply measured, in all documents, by units. But we can work with that. So far I've learned that 82% of zoned lots in Manhattan are residential, making up about 280,000,000 square feet, which includes permanently undeveloped spaces like yards and gardens. If the average height of development across all that land is four stories, then, we're looking at about 750 square feet per person. I've also learned that in 1999 there were about 727,000 residential units in Manhattan , which means that the average unit houses two people. So those three-roomies crammed into one 800-square-foot-tenement-with-the-bathtub-in-the-kitchen examples are mostly fiction. Which is a shame because I get a tingle from the mental picture of Manhattan twenty- and thirty-somethings living in cramped, dingy conditions. If we divide the total residential land area by the total number of units, we get 385 square feet, which works out to 192.5 square feet per person, assuming no dwellings above one story in height and no unimproved/vacant land. If the average height is assumed to be four stories, in this scenario we get about 770 square feet per person. Here's a report from Prudential Douglas Elliman that details its 1Q 2005 sales. Units sold averaged 1,334 square feet, which divided by two yields 767 square feet per person. Breaking it down further we find co-ops averaging 1,197 square feet, condos at 1,496 square feet, luxury at 2,921 and loft at 2,145. So that's 598.5 square feet per person at the low end all the way up to 1,460.5 at the top. There's three separate analytical models for you Felix, all of which yield per-person square footage of 750 or better. I admit they're not all that fleshed out, but I'm stuck inside with a cold watching The Taking of Pelham One-Two-Three on DVD, and I'm disinclined to dig deeper. But you're welcome to. Posted by: Sterling on December 4, 2005 04:04 AM #15 Sterling: do your calculations include infrastructure or is the 280MM number a percentage of raw space? Building density is higher here than anywhere else in America, but 15% to circulation (in buildings and streets themeselves) would be an easily defended metric. Counting hallways in urban residential structures is like counting sidewalks as part of sf for suburban homes. As much Sterling does sound like a set designer for Friends, Felix, I gotta say, of the 25 or so apartments of people that I can definitely make an estimate of size, we average 500 sf easy. Most everyone is a half a standard tenement lot (25 x 25), with a couple of lofts and post-war, large-scale developments thrown in. This is skewed because many of them are single (I live in a 2bd alone) or have rent-controlled apartments from way back. Posted by: 99 on December 4, 2005 07:19 PM #16 Where does your 280m sq ft number come from? Your first two calculations are based on it, so I'd like to know. (They're also based on a multiplier of 4, which as far as I can tell came pretty much out of thin air.) As for apartment sales, in Manhattan individual condos and coops tend to be much larger than the apartments inside rental buildings. So if you look just at sold apartments as opposed to rented apartments, you're going to get a skewed figure. What's more, if a 3800-square-foot brownstone in Harlem, say, is sold and then the downstairs floor is rented out, that still counts as a 3800 square foot deal under these figures. Posted by: Felix on December 4, 2005 09:21 PM #17 The multiplier of 4 was back-of-envelope guess. The 280,000,000 number came from this PDF . Sorry, thought I'd linked to it initially. As for rental apartments being smaller than privately owned condos or co-ops...not sure I buy that. But even if it's true, how much smaller could they be? 10%? Doesn't really matter. You can apologize any time now. Posted by: Sterling on December 4, 2005 10:06 PM #18 if anyone is real curious why not pony up the $250 to get a list of every tax lot in the city? http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/bytes/applbyte.shtml in the meantime, simply because i am tired of having to read sterlings pontifications about things he knows anything about, i downloaded a list of all the residential tax lots from 14th street and below from propertyshark. only 14th street and below, because after 6000+ entries, i became bored. 14th street down is a good representative sample of the 99000+ residential tax lots in manhattan. it includes spacious luxury lofts of tribeca, tenements of the les, projects on the eastside, high rise high density battery park and half building condo conversions of downtown (note that a rental bldg with multiple units counts as a single tax lot with the number of units listed as a seperate data field). the average unit size works out to 1100sf with 590sf per person (based 2000 census population stats for 14th st & below). this includes all common space in a building as it is based on total building size for single tax lot (rental) buildings and counts common space tax lots for condo buildings (read lobbies, circ, etc.) multiplying back out by the 2000 census population numbers for manhattan of 1,537,195... we get 906,945,050sf of residential space in manhattan. let's call that an even 9Bsf since the city lists 3800 acres of lot area in manhattan (165,500,000sf), that gives a rough overbuild factor of 5.5. this will obviously skew higher with the ues & uws densities without actually affecting the sf/person. summary- -590sf of residential per person (inclusive of common areas). close to sterlings low estimate of 600, but nowhere near the 800sf -1100sf average size per unit (inclusive of common areas). again close to sterlings guess based on broker mumbojumbo, but still below the stated average. -9Bsf of residential space in manhattan sterling- close on your numbers, but not nearly close enough to be quite so pompously smug. stick to things you know about, like why bush is a foreign policy genius. felix- remind me what this related to? Posted by: geoff on December 5, 2005 12:34 AM #19 Geoff - The only reason I was pompously snug is because Felix had reacted to to my estimates with such comedic outrage. Also, I don't think 14th St. and below is a good representative sample. Newer and I suspect more spacious high-rises make up a much larger proportion of housing from the 30s up through the low 100s. So I'm sticking with 600+. I suspect the actual number is around 750, as stated above. As for your justification of your work - "simply because i am tired of having to read sterlings pontifications about things he knows anything about" - I'm not sure what it means. Perhaps you meant to write "nothing" instead of "anything"? I'm not claiming to be right all the time - I am not right all the time. I am, however, pretty much always right whenever Felix gets all worked up and tells me I have no idea what I'm talking about. Thanks for your small role in marking off another example for me to throw back at him at some future date. Posted by: Sterling on December 5, 2005 06:19 AM #20 Renter-occupied apartments are much smaller than owner-occupied apartments. And as the PDF you yourself linked to shows (see page 24), the vast majority of apartments in Manhattan are renter-occupied. Think about it: one needs maybe 350 sq ft per person to live in some reasonable comfort. Beyond that, you're shelling out extra cash for extra space. Owners are happy doing that because they have 100% equity in that space: everyone has heard the advice that they should buy the biggest apartment they can afford. Renters, on the other hand, are simply giving away thousands of dollars in rent every month, with nothing at all to show for it. So they tend to go not for the biggest apartment they can afford, but rather the cheapest apartment they find adequate. Put it this way: Manhattan is full of individuals spending an enormous proportion of their income on outsize mortgage payments. Almost everyone, when they move from renting to buying, sees their monthly housing costs rise substantially. If you move to Manhattan and have a relatively low income, then you might spend a crazy amount of it on rent, it's true. But if your income is average or higher (and remember that average is $2,025 per week), I very much doubt that your rent is making nearly as much of a dent in your paycheck as it would if you owned your own apartment. You reach a standard of living you're comfortable with, and you stop. Anything beyond that is money which you could otherwise spend on clothes, or travel, or restaurants. Whereas if you buy , you're not spending so much as investing. The only money which you're really spending is the interest on your mortgage -- and even that comes with a tax deduction. Or let's put it another way. That Elliman report you linked to has an average sales price of $1.21 million. A typical rental yield in Manhattan these days is 4%, so if rentals were functionally identical to owner-occupied apartments, which you seem to assume, then the average rent in Manhattan would be over $4,000 a month. In fact, of course, it's nowhere near that. Posted by: Felix on December 5, 2005 06:55 AM #21 There's the shark, and then there's the A train. Sterling's Manhattan clearly stops at 96th street. Sterling, dear, north of that bright white line, the housing stock is incredibly stable and consistent in terms of size and layout. Harlem is just now getting it's first 'luxury' apartment building in a half century. Any larger apartment complexes are housing projects, which have smaller units by definition, and, allowing for the dispersal of the towers in some International Style fantasy also insures that the density does not increase much. Posted by: 99 on December 5, 2005 04:03 PM #22 Felix, just because apartments are currently going for $1.21 million a pop doesn't mean that everyone who owns an apartment paid that much. Rent prices move in sympathy with real estate prices but are less prone to bubbles. What you're missing here, and you've missed the same thing when we've talked about the stock market in the past, is the difference between speculative investors and income investors. Speculators don't buy an apartment (or apartment building) primarily for the benefit of the rent; their main motivation is the hope of flipping the property at some later date for a larger sum than they paid for it. The current Manhattan real estate bubble is the product of speculators. Real estate income investors view rent collection as their goal - most apartment buildings in any town or city in the U.S. are owned by income investors. They get less press than speculators, but they also tend to go bankrupt less often. The market value of a rental property can be determined by the amount of rent it generates for the owner, not the other way around. Manhattan rents are high - probably even ludicrously high - but that is a function of large demand chasing relatively low supply, and is only weakly related to current real estate prices. I do acknowledge your point about space not being a priority for Manhattan renters, there is some truth in that. People who do see space as a necessity tend to wind up in rental units in Brooklyn, Queens or Hudson County. But that's not exclusively the case. Posted by: Sterling on December 5, 2005 04:59 PM #23 This thread is hilarious and sad, although a good example of how the same statistics can be applied to support any and all political positions. Posted by: sac on December 5, 2005 06:39 PM #24 Sterling, Manhattan is the one real-estate market in the US where there are, to all intents and purposes, zero speculators under your definition. No one buys Manhattan property in order to flip it. For one thing, co-op boards (and even condo boards, for that matter) hate flippers, and are likely to punish them. There's flip taxes, brokers' fees of 6% for the seller, and a luxury tax of 1% on any apartment over $1m for the buyer. Prices are so high that the carrying costs are enormous -- and you can't rent out the apartment in the meantime, because that makes it pretty much unsaleable. There are, of course, lots of buildings owned by income investors in New York. Most of the East Village, where I live, is comprised of such buildings: they normally have 20 or so apartments (say 5 floors, 4 apartments per floor), and they've been going up in price almost as much as individual apartments have -- the only reason they haven't gone up just as much is because many of the tenants are rent-controlled or rent-stabilised below market. These are typical New York apartments, from a renter's point of view -- but I can tell you, as someone who was apartment hunting in the East Village for almost a year, they're much less typical from an owner's point of view. Also, there's a strong incentive for for-sale apartments to be as large as possible: price per square foot is positively correlated with size. That's not the case in the rental market: it's easier to rent out a 650sqft apartment for $2500 than it is to rent out a 1300sqft apartment for $5000. Posted by: Felix on December 5, 2005 09:14 PM #25 "Manhattan is the one real-estate market in the US where there are, to all intents and purposes, zero speculators under your definition. No one buys Manhattan property in order to flip it." Felix, of course people speculate on property in Manhattan. Just because the barriers to entry are high doesn't mean some won't jump them. How else do you think a modest apartment winds up costing as much as a dozen Mercedes-Benz CL500s? Who do you imagine is providing demand at that level? You know banks are not issuing $1,000,000 mortgages to households with joint incomes of $200,000. It's trust fund kiddies - who are often divorced from fiscal reality - and speculators. As for your point about different-sized apartments being suitable for rent versus sale, I might agree with you except for the fact that every rental apartment IS OWNED by someone. It IS PART of the for sale market. I'd be surprised if fewer than half of the condos in Manhattan are rented out by their owners. Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 01:51 AM #26 Sterling, I'm afraid the factors leading to high apartment prices are much more mundane than your feverish mind would like to imagine. Lots of global liquidity, driving down interest rates and banks' credit tests. Lots of demand, due to Manhattan's status as the center of the universe and high Wall Street bonuses. And very limited supply. The market for flippers is Miami, not NYC -- where a condo can be bought and sold three or four times before it is even built. As for your point about rental apartments being owned by someone, it sounds clever until you stop to think about what I've already said. Rental buildings are owned by landlords; the vast majority of condos and co-ops are owner-occupied. For one thing, co-ops vastly outnumber condos, and they're hard to rent. And as for condos, they generally get rented out when they're not the place their owner really wants to live. Given how valuable they are, few owners who don't want to live here would rather rent out their condos rather than simply sell them. Take my East Village condo building, for instance: when it went condo in 1983, only one owner lived here. Today, all the units bar one are owner-occupied. I haven't done my homework on this, but I'll happily accept your wager: I'll bet the standard bottle of vintage champagne that more than half the condos in Manhattan are owner-occupied. Deal? Posted by: Felix on December 6, 2005 02:43 AM #27 If you go double or nothing on the proposition that the amount of existing residential floor space in Manhattan divided by the number of residents of Manhattan is equal to or greater than 600 sq. ft., then it's a bet. How are we going to research this? FWIW, I am descended from a man who is reputed to be the first person to negotiate a real estate deal in New York: Wessel Wesselse (ten Broek). He may have been the man to offer 60 guilders (often misreported as $24) as the purchase price of Manhattan from the Canarsies. (Technically the Canarsies didn't own Manhattan Island - it's not for nothing that "Canarsie" is in Brooklyn. Also technically the Dutch West India Company didn't care which tribe owned it. It just needed some bunch of natives to smile and sign off on the deal to keep the English away.) This of course conveys no special knowledge upon me, but it certainly adds a humorous subtext to our disagreement. Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 04:14 AM #28 I'm not sure about the terms of the wager: we seem to be betting on two different things at the same time. But spell it out, and I'll be amenable. I do want to ensure, of course, that hallways and elevator shafts and the like do not count as residential floor space. And please also ensure that if one of the propositions can be determined while the other one can't, then the other wager still stands. Posted by: Felix on December 6, 2005 05:55 AM #29 I'm not sure how we could specify the terms to exclude elevators if they are included in filings. However, it occurs to me that Manhattan Borough probably requires a statement of total dwelling space for its Certificate of Occupancy, so that would work for me. And no, I think double or nothing sounds good to me, especially since we will be attempting to falsify two of my estimations, rather than either of yours. Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 06:20 AM #30 You've lost me, I'm afraid. When you say "double or nothing", are you proposing a 2BVC bet on the residential floor space, and no bet at all on the proportion of condos which are rented out? Or what? It makes no sense to me: "double or nothing" normally happens after A has lost a bet and B has won it. Then going double or nothing means that either B wins double the original amount, or he wins nothing. You essentially run the bet over again. Are you maybe trying to propose something whereby if I lose I lose 2BVCs, and if I win I win nothing? Posted by: Felix on December 6, 2005 07:44 AM #31 Are you trying to squirm out of it? Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 06:03 PM #32 Sterling, will you propose your bet already? I've already said that I'm likely to accept. Just tell me the terms! Posted by: Felix on December 6, 2005 06:12 PM #33 I did! Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 06:25 PM #34 OK, have a few moments now, I had to get someplace before 2pm and the roads are crap with snow and slush. Um, OK. My terms for the bet is those two things specified, avg. sq. footage = 600 and = 50% of condos. Either side has to get both right to collect. gotta run Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 06:51 PM #35 So if one of us gets both right, he wins 1BVC or 2BVCs? And if one of the two turns out to be unverifiable, then it's a wash? Posted by: Felix on December 6, 2005 07:22 PM #36 Honestly, Felix, I doubt either number is verifiable. Like I wrote above, the city appears to track residential rental inventory by units, rather than by square footage. Also, most owners of condominium units who rent them out do so through agents - even the tenant may be only vaguely aware of the legal status of the unit. In NJ I don't think an individual condo owner even needs to report the unit as a rental property if it's in a building that's already inspected under multi-family housing regulations (or if it's a standalone unit or duplex). The rent revenue has to be reported as taxable income, naturallly, but not to any entity with housing oversight. So make it for one bottle and yes both figures have to be verifiable. That said, if either of us can show a grouping of not-completely-conclusive figures from multiple sources that seem reasonable and fall long or short of my guesses by ten percent or more, then I think we should accept them. (Of course, I have arguably already met this condition with my square footage prediction, and Geoff's calculations don't contradict it under the 10% rule I suggest.) Posted by: Sterling on December 6, 2005 10:05 PM #37 as i mentioned earlier, you can get the sf and unit count for every residential tax lot in the city from the cities web site... google 'bytes of the big apple' and look at the 'pluto' product. the license fee is $250 or you can get the info from propertyshark.com. there are 99000+ listings for manhattan. at 100 listings per page, thats a lot of cutting and pasting into excel. both of these will give you tax lot sizes (whole buildings/unit count or condo unit), which will be inclusive of common area. 10-15% is considered a fairly standard deduction for circulation. mechanical space is not included in the floor area count. happy dueling Posted by: geoff on December 6, 2005 10:29 PM Post a comment Name: Email Address: URL: Remember personal info? Yes No Anti-spam question: Share four cupcakes equally among four people. How many does each person get (in digits)? Comments: XML Atom RSS 2.0 RSS 1.0 Sources Eurof Felix Jame Michelle Mike Sage7 Stefan Sterling &c. Disclaimer Archive 12/05 11/05 10/05 09/05 08/05 07/05 06/05 05/05 04/05 03/05 02/05 01/05 12/04 11/04 10/04 09/04 08/04 07/04 06/04 05/04 04/04 03/04 02/04 01/04 12/03 11/03 10/03 09/03 Old site Recent posts 08/12: Not man enough (1) 08/12: Fare's fair (0) 07/12: Briddishisms (5) 06/12: The Trial of Saddam (5) 05/12: Leg deficiencies (4) 01/12: New York real-estate prices explained (37) 30/11: Bad vibe (22) 30/11: Thick-headed bouncers (0) 29/11: Argentina's sinister move (2) 28/11: Bedbugs and the city (8) 27/11: I've got a fast card (1) 22/11: Pedestrianize Broadway! (5) 19/11: Century 21 the next casualty at Ground Zero? (23) 19/11: Johnny Depp - sunshine traitor (4) 18/11: Gawker F***** by Yahoo! (7) Comments 06/12: geoff: as i mentioned earlier, you can get the sf and unit count for every residential tax lot in the ci 06/12: Sterling: Honestly, Felix, I doubt either number is verifiable. Like I wrote above, the city appears to tr 06/12: Felix: So if one of us gets both right, he wins 1BVC or 2BVCs? And if one of the two turns out to be unv 06/12: Sterling: OK, have a few moments now, I had to get someplace before 2pm and the roads are crap with snow an 06/12: Sterling: I did! 06/12: Felix: Sterling, will you propose your bet already? I've already said that I'm likely to accept. Just te 06/12: Sterling: Are you trying to squirm out of it? 06/12: Felix: You've lost me, I'm afraid. When you say "double or nothing", are you proposing a 2BVC bet on the 06/12: Sterling: I'm not sure how we could specify the terms to exclude elevators if they are included in filings. 06/12: Felix: I'm not sure about the terms of the wager: we seem to be betting on two different things at the s 06/12: Sterling: If you go double or nothing on the proposition that the amount of existing residential floor spac 06/12: Felix: Sterling, I'm afraid the factors leading to high apartment prices are much more mundane than your 06/12: Sterling: "Manhattan is the one real-estate market in the US where there are, to all intents and purposes, 05/12: Felix: Sterling, Manhattan is the one real-estate market in the US where there are, to all intents and p 05/12: sac: This thread is hilarious and sad, although a good example of how the same statistics can be appli 05/12: Sterling: Felix, just because apartments are currently going for $1.21 million a pop doesn't mean that ever 05/12: 99: There's the shark, and then there's the A train. Sterling's Manhattan clearly stops at 96th stree 05/12: Felix: Renter-occupied apartments are much smaller than owner-occupied apartments. And as the < 05/12: Sterling: Geoff - The only reason I was pompously snug is because Felix had reacted to to my estimates with 05/12: geoff: if anyone is real curious why not pony up the $250 to get a list of every tax lot in the city?<br 04/12: Sterling: The multiplier of 4 was back-of-envelope guess. The 280,000,000 number came from <a href 04/12: Felix: Where does your 280m sq ft number come from? Your first two calculations are based on it, so I'd 04/12: 99: Sterling: do your calculations include infrastructure or is the 280MM number a percentage of raw 04/12: Sterling: I've tried to find the statistic, but to no avail. It seems that while office space inventor is 04/12: Sterling: My claim is that the amount of residential-zoned floor space in Manhattan probably works out to b 04/12: Felix: Sterling jumped the shark so long ago it's probably not surprising, but for those of you keeping 04/12: Sterling: OK, 22 square miles equals about 613,324,800 square feet. That would leave each of Manhattan's 1 03/12: Felix: OK, Sterling, let's do it your way. Assume that each of the 1.5 million residents of Manhattan ha 03/12: Sterling: I don't think I'm confused. My points are: a) there is actually quite a bit more than 22 02/12: Andrew: Susan and Sterling, you are embarassingly confused. What percentage of real estate in Manhattan i Trackbacks

Buy Property

PROPERTY IN SPAIN Property in Spain Property in Spain . Section for people wanting to buy, sell or rent property in Spain. Buying property in Spain Property market in Spain - News Buying a house in Spain - tips Buying a house in Spain - faqs Buying a house in Spain: taxes Mortgages in Spain Mortgages for non-residents Buying land in Spain Spanish banks Investing in property in Spain Renting accommodation in Spain Revaluation of property in Spain House prices in Spain per region Reasons for living in Spain Helpdesk Property for sale Property for rent Restaurants in Spain Hotels in Spain Shopping in Spain Travel in Spain Spanish culture Spanish recipes Beautiful places in Spain Healthcare in Spain News from Spain Fiestas in Spain Photos of Spain Spanish wines Spanish classical music Blogs about living in Spain Eigentum Spanien Le Marché inmobilier en Espagne Vivienda en España Thinking of buying a house in Spain ? The Spanish property market is a thriving, but complex, sector and more and more non-residents are taking advantage of low interest rates in Spain and reasonable house prices. However, it is very very important to consider all the possible pitfalls involved in purchasing property in Spain. This section is designed to help you to do so. There are many reasons to live in Spain , and lots of benefits to be got out of making a wise property purchase here. But, as is the case in any big, profitable sector, there are also alot of sharks swimming around in the real-estate sea, dying to get their jaws around that sales commission. So be very very careful , make sure you read as much as you can about how to protect your rights and your investment before taking the plunge. Learn the basics before you start looking. See our Spanish-English real estate glossary with full definitions of the most important concepts you'll need to know about the Spanish property market. And visit the sections listed below with useful information about the different aspects of buying property in Spain. Latest news on the property market in Spain - selection of news articles related to the real estate market here. Buying property in Spain - our new blog created to answer your questions and inform Mortgages in Spain - a brief introduction to the Spanish mortgage market, how it works and interest rates in Spain Mortgages for non-residents in Spain - details on how to apply for a mortage with a Spanish bank. Spanish banks - before applying for a mortgage, find out more about Spain's most popular banks and Spanish savings banks . Buying a house in Spain - advice to bear in mind if you are thinking of buying a Spanish property in FAQs format. See also tips . Buying land in Spain - special advice for people considering the option of buying land and building their own house. Property taxes in Spain - description of taxes involved in purchasing property and yearly property taxes in Spain . Useful Spanish vocab for buying a house - you should learn at least the basic terms. Check out our pronunciation guide too. Investing in property in Spain - a brief overview and latest figures on the revaluation of property in Spain . Renting property in Spain - if you want to buy to rent, then read this section and our free notice board of property to rent in Spain . Spanish lawyers - information on lawyers fees in Spain for property transactions Helpdesk - if you can't find the answer to what you are looking for, drop us a line and we'll try and help Houses for sale in Spain - take a look at the kind of houses available. Or check out our free Spain property for sale board. Property in Spain. © 2000 Euroresidentes. ItyIs Siglo XXI, Spain. About Euroresidentes

INVESTMENT PROPERTY HISTORY OF

IAS Plus International Accounting Standards IAS 40, Investment Property Home Site Map Standards Interpretations Agenda Structure Newsletter Resources Countries/Regions Links Search STANDARDS: IAS 40 INVESTMENT PROPERTY HISTORY OF IAS 40 October 1984 Exposure Draft E26 Accounting for Investments March 1986 IAS 25 Accounting for Investments 1 January 1987 Effective Date of IAS 25 December 1999 Exposure Draft E64 Investment Property April 2000 IAS 40 Investment Property superseded those portions of IAS 25 that addressed investment property and withdrew IAS 25 1 January 2001 Effective Date of IAS 40 (2000) 18 December 2003 Revised version of IAS 40 issued by the IASB The summary below reflects the revisions. 1 January 2005 Effective date of IAS 40 (Revised 2003) RELATED INTERPRETATIONS Issues Relating to This Standard that IFRIC Did Not Add to Its Agenda SUMMARY OF IAS 40 Definition of Investment Property Investment property is property (land or a building or part of a building or both) held (by the owner or by the lessee under a finance lease) to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both. [IAS 40.5] Examples of investment property: [IAS 40.8] Land held for long-term capital appreciation Land held for undecided future use Building leased out under an operating lease Vacant building held to be leased out under an operating lease The following are not investment property and, therefore, are outside the scope of IAS 40: [IAS 40.5 and 40.9] property held for use in the production or supply of goods or services or for administrative purposes; property held for sale in the ordinary course of business or in the process of construction of development for such sale (IAS 2 Inventories); property being constructed or developed on behalf of third parties (IAS 11 Construction Contracts); owner-occupied property (IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment), including property held for future use as owner-occupied property, property held for future development and subsequent use as owner-occupied property, property occupied by employees and owner-occupied property awaiting disposal; property that is being constructed of developed for use as an investment property (IAS 16 applies to such property until construction or development is complete). However, IAS 40 does apply to existing investment property that is being redeveloped for continuing use as investment property; and property leased to another entity under an finance lease. Other Classification Issues Property held under an operating lease. A property interest that is held by a lessee under an operating lease may be classified and accounted for as investment property provided that: [IAS 40.6] the rest of the definition of investment property is met; the operating lease is accounted for as if it were a finance lease in accordance with IAS 17 Leases; and the lessee uses the fair value model set out in this Standard for the asset recognised. An entity may make the foregoing classification on a property-by-property basis. Partial own use. If the owner uses part of the property for its own use, and part to earn rentals or for capital appreciation, and the portions can be sold or leased out separately, they are accounted for separately. Therefore the part that is rented out is investment property. If the portions cannot be sold or leased out separately, the property is investment property only if the owner-occupied portion is insignificant. [IAS 40.10] Ancillary services. If the enterprise provides ancillary services to the occupants of a property held by the enterprise, the appropriateness of classification as investment property is determined by the significance of the services provided. If those services are a relatively insignificant component of the arrangement as a whole (for instance, the building owner supplies security and maintenance services to the lessees), then the enterprise may treat the property as investment property. Where the services provided are more significant (such as in the case of an owner-managed hotel), the property should be classified as owner-occupied. [IAS 40.11] Intracompany rentals. Property rented to a parent, subsidiary, or fellow subsidiary is not investment property in consolidated financial statements that include both the lessor and the lessee, because the property is owner-occupied from the perspective of the group. However, such property could qualify as investment property in the separate financial statements of the lessor, if the definition of investment property is otherwise met. [IAS 40.15] Recognition Investment property should be recognised as an asset when it is probable that the future economic benefits that are associated with the property will flow to the enterprise, and the cost of the property can be reliably measured. [IAS 40.16] Initial measurement Investment property is initially measured at cost, including transaction costs. Such cost should not include start-up costs, abnormal waste, or initial operating losses incurred before the investment property achieves the planned level of occupancy. [IAS 40.20 and 40.23] Measurement subsequent to initial recognition IAS 40 permits enterprises to choose between: [IAS 40.30] a fair value model; and a cost model. One method must be adopted for all of an entity's investment property. Change is permitted only if this results in a more appropriate presentation. IAS 40 notes that this is highly unlikely for a change from a fair value model to a cost model. Fair value model Investment property is remeasured at fair value, which is the amount for which the property could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of investment property must be included in net profit or loss for the period in which it arises. [IAS 40.35] Fair value should reflect the actual market state and circumstances as of the balance sheet date. [IAS 40.38] The best evidence of fair value is normally given by current prices on an active market for similar property in the same location and condition and subject to similar lease and other contracts. [IAS 40.45] In the absence of such information, the entitymay consider current prices for properties of a different nature or subject to different conditions, recent prices on less active markets with adjustments to reflect changes in economic conditions, and discounted cash flow projections based on reliable estimates of future cash flows. [IAS 40.46] There is a rebuttable presumption that the enterprise will be able to determine the fair value of an investment property reliably on a continuing basis. However, if, in exceptional circumstances, an entity follows the fair value model but at acquisition concludes that a property's fair value is not expected to be reliably measurable on a continuing basis, the property is accounted for in accordance with the benchmark treatment under IAS 16 , Property, Plant and Equipment (cost less accumulated depreciation less accumulated impairment losses). [IAS 40.53] Where a property has previously been measured at fair value, it should continue to be measured at fair value until disposal, even if comparable market transactions become less frequent or market prices become less readily available. [IAS 40.55] Cost Model After initial recognition, investment property is accounted for in accordance with the cost model as set out in IAS 16 , Property, Plant and Equipment – cost less accumulated depreciation and less accumulated impairment losses. [IAS 40.56] Transfers to or from Investment Property Classification Transfers to, or from, investment property should only be made when there is a change in use, evidenced by: [IAS 40.57] commencement of owner-occupation (transfer from investment property to owner-occupied property); commencement of development with a view to sale (transfer from investment property to inventories); end of owner-occupation (transfer from owner-occupied property to investment property); commencement of an operating lease to another party (transfer from inventories to investment property); or end of construction or development (transfer from property in the course of construction/development to investment property. When an enterprise decides to sell an investment property without development, the property is not reclassified as investment property but is dealt with as investment property until it is disposed of. The following rules apply for accounting for transfers between categories: for a transfer from investment property carried at fair value to owner-occupied property or inventories, the fair value at the change of use is the 'cost' of the property under its new classification; [IAS 40.60] for a transfer from owner-occupied property to investment property carried at fair value, IAS 16 should be applied up to the date of reclassification. Any difference arising between the carrying amount under IAS 16 at that date and the fair value is dealt with as a revaluation under IAS 16; [IAS 40.61] for a transfer from inventories to investment property at fair value, any difference between the fair value at the date of transfer and it previous carrying amount should be recognised in net profit or loss for the period; [IAS 40.63] and when an entity completes construction/development of an investment property that will be carried at fair value, any difference between the fair value at the date of transfer and the previous carrying amount should be recognised in net profit or loss for the period. [IAS 40.65] When an entity uses the cost model for investment property, transfers between categories do not change the carrying amount of the property transferred, and they do not change the cost of the property for measurement or disclosure purposes. Disposal An investment property should be derecognised on disposal or when the investment property is permanently withdrawn from use and no future economic benefits are expected from its disposal. The gain or loss on disposal should be calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and should be recognised as income or expense in the income statement. [IAS 40.66 and 40.69] Compensation from third parties is recognised when it becomes receivable. [IAS 40.72] Disclosure Both Fair Value Model and Cost Model [IAS 40.75] whether the fair value or the cost model is used; if the fair value model is used, whether property interests held under operating leases are classified and accounted for as investment property; if classification is difficult, the criteria to distinguish investment property from owner-occupied property and from property held for sale. the methods and significant assumptions applied in determining the fair value of investment property. the extent to which the fair value of investment property is based on a valuation by a qualified independent valuer; if there has been no such valuation, that fact must be disclosed. the amounts recognised in profit or loss for: rental income from investment property; direct operating expenses (including repairs and maintenance) arising from investment property that generated rental income during the period; and direct operating expenses (including repairs and maintenance) arising from investment property that did not generate rental income during the period. restrictions on the realisability of investment property or the remittance of income and proceeds of disposal. contractual obligations to purchase, construct, or develop investment property or for repairs, maintenance or enhancements. Additional Disclosures for the Fair Value Model [IAS 40.76] a reconciliation between the carrying amounts of investment property at the beginning and end of the period, showing additions, disposals, fair value adjustments, net foreign exchange differences, transfers to and from inventories and owner-occupied property, and other changes. significant adjustments to an outside valuation (if any) if an entity that otherwise uses the fair value model measures an item of investment property using the cost model, certain additional disclosures are required. Additional Disclosures for the Cost Model [IAS 40.79] the depreciation methods used; the useful lives or the depreciation rates used; the gross carrying amount and the accumulated depreciation (aggregated with accumulated impairment losses) at the beginning and end of the period; a reconciliation of the carrying amount of investment property at the beginning and end of the period, showing additions, disposals, depreciation, impairment recognised or reversed, foreign exchange differences, transfers to and from inventories and owner-occupied property, and other changes; the fair value of investment property. If the fair value of an item of investment property cannot be measured reliably, additional disclosures are required, including, if possible, the range of estimates within which fair value is highly likely to lie.

Property Listings Accepts a

Canada Real Estate for Sale. Canadian property listing classifieds. Internet Property Listings Real Estate For Sale Throughout Canada Search for available FSBO Private Sales and MLS Realtor Listings or List your property for sale on our Classifieds Web Site. | Home | Search / Add Listings | Selling Through a Realtor | Selling Privately | Buying Tips | Selling Tips | Moving Tips | | Business Opportunity | Pricing / Special Promotion | Listing Benefits | Payment Options | Payment Procedures | Pay for Listing | | Franchise Opportunity | Teen / Child Safety Tips | FAQ's | Links | Terms of Use / Disclaimer | Contact Us | Refund Policy | Decided To Sell Your Real Estate On Your Own Through Private Sale? List your " For Sale By Owner " home or property with us and maximize its exposure to thousands of potential buyers from Canada and around the World! Selling Your Property Through A Realtor Or Real Estate Agent? Advertise your property through us as well and expose it to thousands of potential buyers who find our site when searching the Internet for realestate! For Only $49.00 your property is listed on our web site until it is sold! This is a ONE-TIME only fee, no commissions, no contracts, no hassles and no headaches...............Ever! ( See our Special Promotion ) Welcome to Canada's Fastest Growing Real Estate For Sale Resource! Click on Canadian map to view available properties for sale If you are in the market to buy or sell a single family home, house, cabin, condo / condominium, mobile trailer homes, land, cottage, chalet, recreational or vacation land, fly-in-fishing or hunt camp, acreage, farm house, lake front, lot, resort, log home, ranch, modular home, vacation properties, apartment building, duplex, triplex, fourplex, horse ranch, barn, investment property, townhouse, house boat, lodge, bed and breakfast / B & B, time share, lake, sublet, ski resort, franchise, commercial building, restaurant, hotel, motel, inn, trailer park, business, warehouse and office warehouses, shopping centers, office buildings etc..... You've come to the right place! We list a wide variety of residential, recreational, seasonal, retirement, commercial and industrial real-estate properties, including for sale by owner through " Your Realtor " and for sale by owner ( fsbo ) through " Private Sale ". Here you will find every form of real-estate from tree houses to sky scrapers! Search for available properties in Canadian towns and cities including Victoria British Columbia, Edmonton Alberta, Regina Saskatchewan, Winnipeg Manitoba, Toronto and Ottawa Ontario, Quebec City and Montreal Quebec, Fredericton New Brunswick, St. John's Newfoundland, Halifax Nova Scotia, Iqaluit Nunavut, Charlottetown PEI, Yellowknife North West Territories etc...... Feel free to tour our site and view available listings for sale. Search through our many resources including a convenient mortgage calculator and detailed maps by MapQuest located on most listings. Also our moving and relocation tips, links and resources. MapQuest lets you see exactly where the property you are interested in viewing is located and also provides detailed driving directions to the driveway of your new home or land from any location. View All Properties For Sale! Special Promotion! Reg. $99.00 ........ Pay only $49.00 * $49.00 is a One Time Only fee for Advertising your home, condominium, cottage, farm, land, acreage, apartment, business etc. for sale on our Classifieds Web Site until it is sold. We will donate half of all income generated from this web site to help fund my cross Canada skate for MS. (Multiple Sclerosis) Click here for complete details. Our Company's Goal Our goal is to connect Realestate buyers with sellers, making our site "the place" people turn to first when buying or selling realestate across Canada, USA, UK, Asia, and Internationally! We help provide prospective realestate buyers from all provinces and states with a wide variety of properties to choose from. How? 1) By offering agents and private sellers affordable listing rates, special promotions and resources such as: House Hunter and Comparison Shopper . 2) By filling our classifieds database with as many private and MLS Realtor properties from every town, city, province and state across Canada, USA and the World! 3) By effectively promoting and marketing our web site locally, nationally and internationally so Canadian properties for sale will be seen by prospective buyers. 4) And by filling our web pages with helpful tips, links and resources for anyone buying or selling their home or land. New Realestate Listings Added Daily! Our rapidly growing realestate for sale classifieds database is being updated daily. Search for sales in rural areas, small towns and cities located in all Canadian Provinces and Territories . Please visit our realestate classifieds web site often to locate newly listed properties for sale by owner, through Realtors, agents and realestate professionals in your desired area. Since July 2003 Thank you for visiting Please come again! Click on the photos below to view our Feature Properties and to see how your listing will appear when viewed by prospective buyers. Feature Property # 1 Parrsboro Nova Scotia ( Realtor ) Feature Property # 2 Sudbury Ontario ( FSBO ) Feature Property # 3 North Bay Ontario ( FSBO ) Feature Property # 4 SOLD Manitouwadge Ontario ( FSBO ) Feature Property # 5 Lac du Bonnet Manitoba ( FSBO ) View All Properties For Sale! Alberta - British Columbia - Manitoba - New Brunswick - Newfoundland - Northwest Territories - Nova Scotia Nunavut - Ontario - Prince Edward Island - Quebec - Saskatchewan - Yukon - Alaska - USA - International Payment Options Internet Property Listings Accepts a wide variety of secure payment options including major Credit Cards, PayPal ®, Interac Direct Deposit ®, cheques and money orders. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you. Weather you are interested in buying or selling Real-estate, think of Internet Prop. Listings first. Internet Property Listings Built, owned and operated by J-R Daoust Member of the Kirkland Lake, Ontario Chamber of Commerce We service all Canadian provinces, the United States ( USA ), UK, Asia and International Countries. Alberta - British Columbia - Manitoba - New Brunswick - Newfoundland - Northwest Territories - Nova Scotia Nunavut - Ontario - Prince Edward Island - Quebec - Saskatchewan Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, South America Billions and Billions Served: Monthly Traffic to WSI Franchise Corporate Web Site Hits Record High By utilizing the same technologies that helped to establish online success for their clients, WSI Franchise own corporate Web Site now receives more traffic than any other franchise Web Site in the world. | Home | Search / Add Listings | Selling Through a Realtor | Selling Privately | Buying Tips | Selling Tips | Moving Tips | | Business Opportunity | Pricing / Special Promotion | Listing Benefits | Payment Options | Payment Procedures | Pay for Listing | | Franchise Opportunity | Teen / Child Safety Tips | FAQ's | Links | Terms of Use / Disclaimer | Contact Us | Refund Policy | Warning Beware of calls or e-mails from Africa regarding the purchase of your property. Click Here for "419 Africa Fraud Scam" information! Awards Alberta - British Columbia - Manitoba - New Brunswick - Newfoundland - Northwest Territories - Nova Scotia Nunavut - Ontario - Prince Edward Island - Quebec - Saskatchewan Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, South America

house rental Home Page

Rentals South Carolina vacation rental - condo / house - Hilton Head Island South Carolina Myrtle Beach South Carolina North Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation condo or house rental Home Page = USA Vacation Rentals = South Carolina Vacation Rentals Rentals in South Carolina Vacation Rental Properties A new window will open for each individual rental property clicked on. (#) - pictures - availability calendar Vacation Property for rent in South Carolina include: (cities are added as listings become available) 2005-12-29  Hilton Head Island Myrtle Beach North Myrtle Beach Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental return to top of South Carolina page or return to state list of USA vacation rentals Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Oceanfront Breakers #222 Great Location - Coligny Circle (3) Listing #144 Hilton Head Island Accom:  1 Bedroom 1 Full Bath Condo Sleeps up to 4: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $500 - $850 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals New Tile & Appliances! 2 Pools S. End of Island near Coligny (3) Listing #9 Hilton Head Island Accom:  1 Bedroom 1 Full Bath Villa Sleeps up to 4: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 300 - 750 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Picturesque PD Resort Villas Close to Beach, Golf & Tennis (3) Listing #15 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Villa Sleeps up to 8: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 625 - 1075 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals Lowest Rates - Outdoor Pool S. End of Island near Coligny (3) Listing #327 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 1 Full Bath Villa Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $300 - $700 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Hilton Head Resort #1110 Ocean, Marsh and Lagoon Views! (3) Listing #148 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Villa Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 450 - 700 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals Hilton Head Beach and Tennis Resort (2) Listing #430 Hilton Head Island Accom:  1 Bedroom 1 Full Bath Villa Sleeps up to 6: Daily Rate (USA Dollars): $100 - $100 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Sea Pines 1BR Near Harbor Town Pool, Tennis, Bike to Beach (3) Listing #257 Hilton Head Island Accom:  1 Bedroom 1 Full Bath Villa Sleeps up to 4: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $600 - 900 Hilton Head Island vacation rentals TRUE DIRECT OCEANFRONT VIEW Totally Remodeled+Luxurious! (6) Listing #75 Hilton Head Island Accom:  1 Bedroom 1 Full Bath Villa Sleeps up to 4: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $550/wk - $795/wk Hilton Head Island South Carolina rental French Villa @ Shipyard 3 Bdrm, 3 Bath - Golf, Lagoon (2) Listing #267 Hilton Head Island Accom:  3 Bedrooms 3 Full Baths 1 Half Bath Villa Sleeps up to 11: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 650 - 1450 Hilton Head Island South Carolina rentals BREAKERS #240 FANTASTIC VIEW TRUE DIRECT OCEANFRONT ENDUNIT (3) Listing #22 Hilton Head Island Accom:  1 Bedroom 1 Full Bath Condo Sleeps up to 4: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 400 - 925 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Hilton Head Ocean Villa Condo Gold Rated HHB&T Ocean View (3) Listing #72 Hilton Head Island Accom:  1 Bedroom 1 Full Bath Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 495 - 750 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals HILTON HEAD 2 BD OCEAN VILLA OCEAN FUN THAT'S AFFORDABLE (3) Listing #296 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Villa Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $650.00* - $850.00* Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Quiet Colonnade, Walk to Beach Shipyard-on Beach Path (3) Listing #10 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 560 - 895 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals Island Club of Hilton Head Oceanfront Condo (3) Listing #41 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 900 - 1199 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Hilton Head Resort #2203 Fabulous Oceanview (3) Listing #274 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 5: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $500.00 - $750.00 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals HILTON HEAD CONDO WITH BEAUTIFUL OCEAN VIEW (3) Listing #25 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 4: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $550/week - $950/week Hilton Head Island vacation rental Brand New 3 Bedroom Villa Terrific Golf Views (3) Listing #31 Hilton Head Island Accom:  3 Bedrooms 3 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 837 - 1395 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals Economy Oceanside Rental Private Ocean Access (3) Listing #273 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Villa Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 450 - 700 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Shipyard/Beachwalk Dream Villa Steps to Beach; 2 Bikes (3) Listing #4 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Villa Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $575 - $850 Hilton Head Island South Carolina rentals #1 Family Oceanfront Resort Tennis Villa (3) Listing #1 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Villa Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $600 - $975 Hilton Head Island South Carolina rental VIP 3 BD Villa Balcony Views Indoor Pool Balcony Views Also Listing #314 Hilton Head Island Accom:  3 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 8: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 900 - 900 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals Best Kept Secret in HH Family or Golf Vacation (3) Listing #259 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Villa Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $375 - $775 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Tennismaster Internet & Bikes Snowbird Rates (3) Listing #302 Hilton Head Island Accom:  3 Bedrooms 3 Full Baths 1 Half Bath Townhouse Sleeps up to 10: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 700 - 1395 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals Spectacular Ocean Views and Affordable for You (3) Listing #51 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Villa Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $500 - $750 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Hilton Head Island Villa Near Beach - Fiddler's Cove (3) Listing #177 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Villa Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 700 - 850 Hilton Head Island vacation rentals Recenly awarded "VIP" status!! Adjacent to Harbourtown Golf (6) Listing #106 Hilton Head Island Accom:  4 Bedrooms 4 Full Baths Townhouse Sleeps up to 10: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $1200/wk - $1700/wk Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental #1 PARADISE VACATION GREAT FAMILY RESORT (3) Listing #270 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $500.00 - $850.00 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals HHI Beach & Tennis Club Beautiful Ocean View (6) Listing #232 Hilton Head Island Accom:  1 Bedroom 1 Full Bath Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $400 - $550 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rental Fantastic Resort Villa Affordable Too (3) Listing #320 Hilton Head Island Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Villa Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 500 - 750 Hilton Head Island South Carolina vacation rentals Affordable and Family Oriented Just Steps to the Beach (3) Listing #76 Hilton Head Island Accom:  1 Bedroom 1 Full Bath Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $350/week - $600/week Hilton Head Island South Carolina rental Palmetto Dunes Villa Palmetto Dunes Villa (3) Listing #42 Hilton Head Island Accom:  4 Bedrooms 3 Full Baths Townhouse Sleeps up to 10: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 1000 - 2000 Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation rentals return to top of South Carolina page or return to state list of USA vacation rentals Myrtle Beach South Carolina rentals Beautiful Shore Dr. Condo Oceanfront, Side View (3) Listing #159 Myrtle Beach Accom:  2 Bedrooms 1 Full Bath 1 Half Bath Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $400 - $975 Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation rental Sun and Fun Beach Villa Rental On Beautiful Shore Drive (3) Listing #254 Myrtle Beach Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $600.00 - $950.00 Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation rentals Lovely Myrtle Beach Resort Huge New Lazy River for 2005! (3) Listing #332 Myrtle Beach Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 359 - 999 Myrtle Beach vacation rental Kingston Plantation Oceanfront 3BR / 3BA, OF 3 Balconies (3) Listing #261 Myrtle Beach Accom:  3 Bedrooms 3 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 10: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 1500 - 3300 Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation rentals Fabulous View - Ocean & Pool Ocean Forest Villas (3) Listing #40 Myrtle Beach Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $336 - $1064 Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation rental Ocean Forest Villa Condo Oceanview Condo (3) Listing #3 Myrtle Beach Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $475 - $950 North Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation rental return to top of South Carolina page or return to state list of USA vacation rentals North Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation rentals Waterpointe I - On The Beach Spacious 3BR Condo (3) Listing #428 North Myrtle Beach Accom:  3 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 8: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): 700 - 1700 North Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation rental North Myrtle Beach Condo Direct Ocean Front (3) Listing #23 North Myrtle Beach Accom:  3 Bedrooms 3 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 11: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $600 - $1600 North Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation rentals Windy Hills Beach Front Balco Oceanfront and Pool View (3) Listing #244 North Myrtle Beach Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $ 440.00 - $ 1100.00 North Myrtle Beach South Carolina vacation rental Ocean Front wt. Screen Porch Great View (3) Listing #265 North Myrtle Beach Accom:  2 Bedrooms 2 Full Baths Condo Sleeps up to 6: Weekly Rate (USA Dollars): $750 - $995